https://blockchaingroup.io/big-blockchain-intelligence-group-inc-big-comments-on-top-emerging-patterns-in-international-cryptocurrency-regulation-development-and-offers-policy-recommendations/
VANCOUVER, BC – May 15, 2018 – BIG Blockchain Intelligence Group Inc. (“BIG” or “the Company”) (CSE: BIGG)(WKN: A2JSKG)(OTC: BBKCF), a leading developer of Blockchain technology search, risk-scoring and data analytics solutions, is pleased to comment on what it views as the top three emerging trends in cryptocurrency regulation development across a range of countries, while also offering policy recommendations related to these trends.
In addition to providing blockchain technology tools and forensic services, BIG is also focused on participating in the development of policies and regulations that will support the use of cryptocurrencies in a secure and transparent manner. Toward that end, BIG previously ran a trial with the U.S. Treasury Department; established operations in Washington, D.C. in May 2018; and is currently seeking to partner with regulatory agencies that could benefit from BIG’s expertise in the cryptocurrency space . With close proximity to the regulatory bodies, all having varying opinions on Cryptocurrency, BIG’s focus is to offer the agencies technical understanding, strategies and solutions that could be deployed to mitigate the criminal activity involving cryptocurrencies.
BIG’s CEO, Lance Morginn, commented: “Today’s cryptocurrency market and the development of national regulations are still in their early days, and we look forward to being a contributing factor in the shaping of policy that results in the widespread adoption of cryptocurrencies. Three emerging patterns are clear across major countries currently grappling with the new era of digital currencies. Our team at BIG has a unique take on policy recommendations, coming from the perspective of seasoned investigators and a Big Data search and analytics provider to the cryptocurrency space. That is why we’re excited to discuss these developing regulatory patterns and our policy recommendations.”
Pattern #1: Growing Recognition of Security Risks
More and more countries are recognizing the need to address security risks related to cryptocurrencies, which is positive news for the future of cryptocurrency and its users. In the US, Secretary of the Treasury, Steve Mnuchin, clarified his primary focus on cryptocurrencies was to “make sure that they’re not used for illicit activities.” In Europe, the UK Treasury along with the EU have made plans that would call for cryptocurrency platforms to conduct proper due diligence on customers while reporting any suspicious transactions. In Russia, President Vladimir Putin stated the use of cryptocurrencies carries serious risks ranging from money laundering to tax evasion, financing terrorism and spreading fraudulent schemes. Similar positions have been clearly stated by other countries, including Canada, Singapore and India, as they come to understand the need to address security risks through technology and cryptocurrency regulation.
Pattern #2: Inconsistent Stances on Cryptocurrency Regulation
Many countries are finding it difficult to decide on what their general approach will be to cryptocurrency regulation. According to Bitcoin Magazine, the US currently has “no coherent direction on its cryptocurrency regulation other than that there will be some soon,” and “Russia, like South Korea, can’t seem to decide how it wants to handle cryptocurrency regulations.” Singapore has been relatively lax compared to many of its counterparts in Asia, but then took a somewhat less liberal stance lately in Q1 2018. India has gone from being viewed as a friendly environment for cryptocurrencies, to recently clamping down on cryptocurrencies in 2018. Australia’s initial “hands-off” trajectory to cryptocurrencies back in 2015 has been replaced recently with that government strengthening its anti-money laundering laws and regulating digital currencies following the financial scandal surrounding the Commonwealth Bank of Australia in 2017.
Exceptions to this pattern include China on the conservative side, which has consistently taken greater actions to curtail the cryptocurrency space, and Switzerland on the liberal side, which says it wants to be “the crypto-nation.” Despite these exceptions, the prevalent pattern is one of inconsistent national stances toward cryptocurrency regulation during these early days.
Pattern #3: Cryptocurrency as Potential Solution to Fiat Money Issues and Sanctions Avoidance
There are a growing number of countries employing cryptocurrency to address fiat money issues as well as to avoid international sanctions. For example, Venezuela’s government has announced its own oil-backed, state-sanctioned “Petro” cryptocurrency in an effort to overcome that country’s weak economy resulting from international sanctions, and is now offering discounts to other nations that buy Venezuela’s oil in Petro coins. Other countries working on developing native cryptocurrencies to bypass economic sanctions include Iran, Crimea and Russia with its CryptoRuble. Meanwhile, Nigerians used cryptocurrencies in 2017 to avoid fiat currency controls put in place to curtail the country’s recession, resulting in a 1500% boom to Bitcoin trading.
BIG’s Policy Recommendations
In response to these three emerging trends in cryptocurrency regulation development, the team at BIG is pleased to offer its top policy recommendations.
Recommendation Regarding Addressing Security Risks
Legislation and regulations are a necessity for any technology, especially if there are ramifications related to money laundering, terrorist financing and sanctions evasion. Governments can address the associated risks with a well-educated and thoughtful approach, which will allow the emergence of the benefits of the technology while mitigating the risk. Engaging the digital currency industry to help develop policies that mitigate financial crime will be key to encouraging the advances and societal benefits of decreased cost and increased security. Key industry contributions could include participating in government forums and task forces, and providing cutting-edge and mutually-beneficial approaches to AML (Anti-Money Laundering) and CTF (Counter-Terrorist Financing) efforts, as well as KYC (Know Your Customer) and KYT (Know Your Transaction) checks.
Recommendation Regarding Inconsistent National Stances on Cryptocurrency Regulation
At the best of times, national policy formation can easily become a silo-ed process. The consequence can be regulations that are researched and developed in relative isolation, which can result in a country’s official positions suffering drastic changes if not costly wholesale reversals. This sort of nation-specific approach to policy formation is not conducive to the development of cryptocurrency policies due to digital currencies having a distinctive lack of restriction within national boundaries or traditional fiscal regulation. Instead, governments can respond to the borderless nature of cryptocurrencies by adopting cross-border approaches to policy formation. The development of transnational legislation and law enforcement could bring a new degree of stability to national stances. The process could be facilitated by intergovernmental organizations such as FATF (the Financial Action Task Force), while industry could play a role by contributing to intelligence sharing, particularly when it comes to responding to international crimes involving cryptocurrency.
Recommendation Regarding Cryptocurrency as a Potential Solution to Fiat Money Issues
The emergence of cryptocurrencies means we are in a new era of currency, which will inevitably require new paradigms regarding risk management, AML and CTF, and new tools and solutions to address the unique risks and advantages associated with digital currencies.
In the years to come, there will only be more nations, criminals and individuals that discover ways to leverage cryptocurrencies that were never possible with fiat money. Since the rules have changed with digital currencies, so too governments will be required to approach rule making in new ways. Regulation will be more effective if designed to embrace cryptocurrencies rather than restrict them; to optimize their contribution in the financial landscape rather than limit it; to focus on accountability rather than absolute control. Once again, the cryptocurrency industry can play a role by providing insight into innovative policy recommendations that could match the rapid innovation occurring in the digital currency marketplace.
References
Carlisle, David. “Virtual Currencies and Financial Crime: Challenges and Opportunities.” Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies, Mar. 2017.
Nelson, Andrew. “Cryptocurrency Regulation in 2018: Where the World Stands Right Now.” Bitcoin Magazine, 1 Feb. 2018, bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/cryptocurrency-regulation-2018-where-world-stands-right-now
Malwa, Shaurya. “Is 2018 the Year of Cryptocurrency Regulation?” BTCManager.com, 13 Mar. 2018, https://btcmanager.com/2018-year-cryptocurrency-regulation
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
