Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
The fact that there are "engines" like the Blackwell product, makes even more sense for a EOP to exist... compared to what today there is on the market
Enough is enough! Another one to the ignore list!!!
My order was filled ... Just 1000 @ $3.90.... I wanted to buy below $4
Unfortumately I came a bit too late to the party and averaging down is a good plan
Very nice. Thank you Walter for sharing!!!!
I would love to get any info. Thank you. Gracias. Merci. Bedankt
traderon74@yahoo.es
Thx Herwig for your generous post. I appreciate that you shared this info with everybody
I loved the presentation. ML is a very good speaker. It is clear he knows what he is talking about, not just only from the technlogical (photonics) point of view, but from the business / industry side. I have seen him more "reliable" than ever
Hi Walter,
I live in Spain and I am very interested in these meetings, as I am considering the possibility of travelling there. I am heavily invested in LWLG
I had already requested some info in that regard, but besides being interrogated in Flemish by a supposed organizer I have received no info.
Is this some sort of private meetings? Is it open? If so, I would appreciate to receive some relative information (traderon74@yahoo.es)
Thanks in advance for your kind reply
Lately I have noticed a peculiar activity in the buys / sells of LWLG.
I find very interesting that there is an almost identical behavior every day… Right after the close there is a huge sell / buy after hours....Yesterday it was over 150.000 shares (see graph below)
I admit I am not an expert, but 1 explanation I find for this behavior is that market movers accumulate and end up selling (dark pool style) to an unidentified customer(s)…. Clearly, someone could be heavily and quietly accumulating
"... This could revolutionize chip design..."
Much more than I expected
"Moreover, the unique combination of plasmonic effects and EO polymers provides additional opportunities beyond traditional communication systems, particularly in the realm of "on-chip" optical interconnects. The ability of plasmonic devices to confine light to sub-wavelength dimensions offers a path toward ultra-compact, high-speed modulators that could be integrated directly "onto silicon chips". This could revolutionize chip design by facilitating direct, high-speed optical communication between different parts of a chip or between different chips within a system, potentially bypassing some of the limitations of electronic interconnects."
Next week share price can start running.... Bought 1000 more shares today
"The potential for Lightwave Logic’s polymer technology to make datacentre operators more competitive with their equipment upgrades has never been higher. As AI changes our lives, we face grand challenges ahead, but we have the motivation to utilise our toolkits to meet those challenges. I’m sure this will involve developing numerous new technologies, but electro-optic polymers are certainly an excellent candidate to move the needle forward for all of us."
Well, it doen't have to impossible to sell the company... AMAT or a similar company could do it without major objections
Interesting thoughts
<<... Can you imagine that a competitor gets control over an essential part of your core business?>>
A hurdle, that lawers can help to sort it out when whichever contract is signed
Exactly my thought... !
I do care... Thank you X
If you find his posts anoying, there is a simple solution: put him on ignore
I have used the ignore option with quite a few individuals and it's like a magic formula!!!
Thanks for the info 👍️
CytoDyn Announces Submission of Clinical Protocol to FDA and Initiation of Pre-Clinical Study in Glioblastoma
https://www.cytodyn.com/newsroom/press-releases/detail/617/cytodyn-announces-submission-of-clinical-protocol-to
In the video, I found very interesting that when at the end Jose Pozo talks about the main speakers that will participate at this Event, and their picture is shown, along with their name and position… the last one shown (out of around 20), without a name or any other tag, is ML… I guess he is already too famous to need any introduction LOL
My question to the bashers: Would he risk his enormous prestige lying and scamming, as some in here proclaim day in and day out?
Maybe because, as ML is continuously stating, Companies need to wait for those tests that prove that the final product is reliable enough??
<<I hear you. But with multiple pdks completed, by multtiple foundries, why aren't they using them with Tier one customers who want faster, less energy using products?>>
Nice post 101, but replying to his posts is playing his game and for his benefit (whichever kind might be)
Hope so!!
Exactly
We shall see
Bought 2000 more shares today
Good buyback EOM
I hope this is true
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/end-naked-short-selling-230100677.html
Is This The End Of Naked Short Selling?
Editor OilPrice.com
Tue, October 17, 2023 at 1:01 AM GMT+2·29 min read
American investors have been taken for a trillion-dollar ride by naked short sellers, in what could turn out to be the biggest financial regulatory scandal in North American history.
While what is now an all-out war on naked short sellers intensifies, there is a new flashpoint on the front line–a potentially devastating ruling targeting those who are alleged to make illegal naked short selling possible: The Facilitators: bankers and brokers.
On September 29, Federal District Court Judge Lorna Schofield of the Southern District of New York issued a ruling that has the potential to significantly disrupt Wall Street compliance, and is a major first step towards protecting retail investors from fraud.
In Harrington Global Opportunity Fund Ltd. v. CIBC World Markets, Inc et.al, Judge Schofield found that broker-dealers may be primarily liable for manipulative trading initiated by their customers because they serve as “gate-keepers” of trading on securities exchanges.
These broker-dealers have a “continuing responsibility to ensure that their customer’s order flow ... is in compliance with all applicable rules, regulations and laws and detect and prevent manipulative or fraudulent trading … under the supervision and control of the firm,” the judge ruled.
The defendants in the case had motioned to dismiss Harrington’s claims of market manipulation and spoofing (when traders place market orders and then cancel them before the order is ever fulfilled, manipulating prices in the meantime). Judge Schofield denied the motion after hearing arguments that broker-dealers are not responsible for “their customers’ trading”.
Instead, the ruling recognizes that not only are broker-dealers the gate-keepers who can enable illegal naked short selling, but they are responsible, and thus liable for their customers’ actions. Schofield described broker-dealers as “reckless in not knowing that the trades being executed at their customers’ direction were manipulative”.
Naked Short Selling: ‘Financial Weapons of Mass Destruction’
Naked shorting creates a dangerous minefield for retail investors. But it’s a minefield that dealer-brokers may now be held liable for thanks to the recent ruling.
Short-selling itself isn’t illegal. In order to legally sell a stock short, traders must first secure a borrow against the shares they intend to sell. Where the September 29 ruling comes into play is at the point of the broker-dealer. Any broker who enters into a stock short on behalf of a trader must have assurances that his client will make a settlement.
As opposed to a “long” sale (where the seller owns the stock), a “short” sale can be either “covered” or “naked”.
If it’s covered, then there is no issue: the short seller has already borrowed or arranged to borrow the shares when the short sale is made.
When things get naked, the regulatory environment becomes riddled with compliance holes. With a naked short, the short seller is selling shares it doesn’t own and has made no arrangements to buy. That means the seller cannot cover or “settle” in this instance. More profoundly, it means they are selling ghost shares that simply do not exist without their further action. The ability to sell an unlimited number of non-existent shares in a publicly-traded company gives a short seller the ultimate power: To destroy and manipulate a company’s share price at will.
This illicit practice artificially dilutes share prices and then companies find themselves in a position where they have to scramble for capital, Bryan Barkley points out in in-depth research published by the Medium.
That scramble then leads to shareholder dilution in more capital raises, in the best cases, and bankruptcy, in the worst cases. If things get to bankruptcy, Barkley writes, then short sellers win big because they no longer need to close out their short positions.
Following the 2008/2009 financial crisis, naked short selling was classified as illegal in the United States, though that labeling has done nothing to thwart this lucrative game.
What makes the September ruling so impactful is this: Without the big banks and financial institutions’ complicity, this highly destructive form of naked short selling could never happen. Instead, they actively facilitate the destruction of shareholder value.
The reason some big banks allow it, despite their sizable compliance departments, appears quite simple: These illegal transactions are highly lucrative. The short-term windfall profits associated with the creation of counterfeit shares are too tempting to resist.
“[...] brokers will place a marker or pledge to deliver the shares on the investors’ accounts, which are made by the seller’s clearing firm”, Barkley explains. “Abusive and unchecked naked shorting can lead to a loss of shareholder rights, including disenfranchisement by overvoting and the resulting throwing out of votes by brokers to conceal the breadth of the naked shorting problem, which could also lead to fraudulent vote results orchestrated by broker-dealers instead of shareholders.”
It often goes well beyond “ghost” shares, too. The most nefarious of short sellers target companies with negative reports–sometimes with legitimate information, and sometimes with falsehoods or half-truths–to drive down share prices with maximum impact, thus ensuring that the companies lose their ability to obtain financing. Once that process is completed, naked shorters then begin to offer those same companies alternative financing (predatory debt), which they have no option but to accept.
When broker-dealers are complicit in this, the system is broken. And complicity takes many forms, including willful booking of client shares as “long” when they are actually “short”.
Gaps in the regulatory environment have continued to fail to subdue these illegal activities.
etc etc
This is what BARD says about their polymer
Bright Photonics and Lightwave Logic are both companies that are developing polymer photonic integrated circuits (PLCs). However, there are some key differences between the polymers that they are using.
Bright Photonics is using a class of organic polymers that have high electro-optic activity. This means that they can be used to create modulators that can change the phase or polarization of light in response to an electric field. Lightwave Logic is also using organic polymers, but their polymers have a different chemical structure that gives them different properties. Lightwave Logic's polymers are more stable and can operate at higher temperatures than Bright Photonics' polymers.
Another difference between the two companies is their approach to manufacturing. Bright Photonics is using a process called "hot embossing" to create their PLCs. This process is relatively simple and can be used to produce PLCs at a relatively low cost. Lightwave Logic is using a more complex process called "polymerization-induced phase separation" to create their PLCs. This process results in PLCs with better performance, but it is also more expensive.
Overall, the polymers that Bright Photonics and Lightwave Logic are using have different properties and are suited for different applications. Bright Photonics' polymers are more flexible and less expensive, while Lightwave Logic's polymers are more stable and can operate at higher temperatures.
Here is a table summarizing the key differences between the polymers used by Bright Photonics and Lightwave Logic:
Thank you Proto.... Very interesting info
Regardless how accurate Bard might be it is amazing how many Foundries seem to be already working with LWLG
I still remember ML referring to the possibility that a Foundry publicly admits their partnership
Any day now we can have some nice surprise!!!
It makes sense what you say
Thanks for your kind reply
If it is a BIG company then I feel kind of disappointed that the amount of money LWLG received was so tiny.
This would make sense if Polariton was behind and the deal happened just as a symbolic event and Polariton had the benefit of being the first one ever
Your quote
Bard agrees with me, Jeunke, and few others that the May 25th 2023 first commercial agreement was not with Polariton but rather a larger company that would require the new lab space in order to fulfill future orders for the LWLG materials under contract, recall this Lebby quote from the news release first
I am not so sure about this
True that we do not have any guidance from the Company, but here in this forum we have enough info, data and understanding to start making projections... either conservative or really wild
I think it would be (it is) a very interesting exercise... Bashers believe nothing will come out in a near future... Others (me included) believe something has been brewing for a while and soon will bear fruit
Sorry, but I do not see the relevance of this Ziehan guy for LWLG
Besides, I do not see a solid foundation on his theories... just lots of blabla blahh
From the interview...
I would have thought of LWLG just as the supplier of the EO Polymer... but I guess they are also into designing modulators
I recently read about your joint efforts with Lightwave Logic. How do you view the role of partnerships and collaborations in achieving your vision for the company?
It’s super-critical. No one can do it alone. One of our company values is also teamwork. And this evolves internally: No one can do it alone. There is no single hero; we are all a team working together. But it applies to partners around the world as well. I think we should join efforts and see synergies rather than competing. One could see Lightwave as a competitor, but we can also see each other as partners and help each other succeed.
I saw this AI related link about a list of companies that would faster benefit from AI and I saw OLED
https://apple.news/ATqm6lILORse4DNiwF9xlYg
Interesting, because I do not see how OLED could be included in that list, unless they heard something about EO polymers…. and they didn’t know better
Yeap! That is exactly my view!!!
I am so happy!!!
Waiting was worth while!!!!