I'm not sure if it would have helped with the share structure, I think those
shares might already be part of the OS if I'm correct. Getting them back
would mean that someone is sitting on millions of shares.
I'm thinking that the object of the suit was to be financially compensated
for the ill-gotten shares.
I may be wrong but that's my thoughts on the expected outcome.
So this is the case that would have helped the share structure of SNDD ?
Not surprised but I did have hopes of a different outcome.
Deep Pockets appear to be incredibly interwoven in New York.
A bit of a setback and deff not what I was expecting but
right now it is what it is.
DarkPulse, Inc. et al v. Crown Bridge Partners LLC et al
ORDER granting23 Motion to Dismiss and directing the Clerk's
Office to close the case.
(Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 9/29/2023)
During 2016, the Company, in conjunction with EcoGen, began marketing the product to large teaching hospitals in the United Kingdom. While the product has been successfully trialed in various surgery disciplines including cardiothoracic, hepatobiliary, pediatric neurosurgery, vascular and trauma surgery and has been shown to outperform currently established products, market acceptance has been limited. We are also considering the introduction of WoundClot into other markets including the United States.
Does anyone know if we are the distributor in the US? If so this is HUGE!
SEC v. LG Capital Funding, LLC et al
Another step in what will go down as one of the most important SEC cases this year.
Wednesday, September 27, 2023
53 notice Notice(Other) Wed 09/27 3:58 PM
NOTICE by Securities and Exchange Commission re28 Memorandum in Opposition,26 MOTION to Dismiss / NOTICE OF DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONS COMPLAINT ,52 Notice(Other), Related [+] (Romajas, Suzanne)
Att: 1 Exhibit (Carebourn MSJ Decision)
We should be hearing about the Redhawk v. N95 court case once something of
significance transpires. With that case, I can see the judge giving the defense a little
wiggle room time wise for them to put forth their best case due to the size of the
Not doing so IMO can leave a minuscule level of doubt even though the contract is
very clear and straight forwards once you've read it a few times.
Right now defense is reaching for straws trying to find something to hang a hat on
but that wall is like tempered glass, smooth and hard.
So at the very most the judge might award them 30 days, (most likely less) from their
receipt of the "AFFIDAVIT of Service for Petition for Confirmation of Arbitration Award
which was served on Jim Zabel on behalf of N95 Shield."
This was filed by our attorney, Andre Toce on 9/22/2023 along with other evidence to
clarify our claims with the court.
Guess we'll just have to keep an eye on that situation to see how it develops, I
can definitely see it moving forwards much quicker than the average lawsuit that
we hear taking months or even years.
Would be nice just to hear anything at this point. The silence for this long is getting a little worrisome
Service for Petition for Confirmation of Arbitration Award served on Jim Zabel
Friday, September 22, 2023
18 service Affidavit of Service Fri 09/22 10:18 AM
AFFIDAVIT of Service for Petition for Confirmation of Arbitration Award served on Jim Zabel on behalf of N95 Shield on 08/21/23, filed by Redhawk Medical Products & Services L L C.(aty,Toce, Andre)
Att: 1 Exhibit Cypress Point Signed Green Card,
Att: 2 Exhibit Cypress Point USPS Tracking Info
17 service Affidavit of Service Fri 09/22 9:56 AM
AFFIDAVIT of Service for Petition for Confirmation of Arbitration Award served on "RAINC" as Agent of N95 Shield on 8/8/23, filed by Redhawk Medical Products & Services L L C.(aty,Toce, Andre)
Att: 1 Exhibit Gould St Signed Green Card,
Att: 2 Exhibit Gould St USPS Tracking Info
Formalities that must play out
You're welcome, we.re all in this together.
I'd like to think that there is more going on
than we know, sometimes I wish I was a
fly on the wall at Redhawk's office.
Well it's a tough question to answer, most audits take 3 months so
depending on when our new auditors started the process add three
We have 2021, 2022 and 2023 to be audited so I'm not sure if there
is a three month timeframe for each year or maybe everything can
be accomplished as a single audit. I honestly do not know how
multiple year audits are processed.
Would be nice to hear or know when some reports are supposed to be coming out!
We are only hearing about this one deal that went south. It will be nice to see the Financials and see revenue from all the deals that went smoothly.
Thanks for the informative posts.
Thanks. Always appreciate your knowledge.
I too have seen this to be the case way too many times, the big difference
that I see here is the plaintiff.
The SEC has a different level of access to ones finances, they have expedited
remedies in the courts that you and I do not have.
The ability to add penalties and disgorgement is added as a hammer. More often
than not they take a plea and settle, often without officially being charged with
The SEC is satisficed at that point and doesn't pursue the legal battle any further.
From what I see it isn't a matter of LG paying out at this point I believe it is
more of a precedent setting case. Once the SEC wins this case and they
most likely will the broader outcome most likely will be that the similar cases
(involving toxic lenders) will cause them to be more open and come to the
table to settle, especially with the RICO class action case presently underway.
I doubt they want to risk paying triple the settlement due to it being a RICO case.
I'm pretty sure this case is extremely relevant to all the other cases underway.
This should initiate a snowball effect with toxic lenders eager to put this behind
them without being charged with a crime, the majority of these types of cases
often get settled in the 11th hour. Anyone that has ever served on a jury usually
sit through the trial hoping something of importance happens but as the case
winds down the lawyers often have an epiphany and have a settlement conference.
All of your time spent as a juror often ends up as legal fodder for the system of justice.
It has/had to play out in court, in the end the lawyers come to their senses and
show that they earned their pay by getting a settlement for their client.
MY TWO CENTS ON OUR SYSTEM OF JUSTICE
You can be blatantly guilty Cowpie, and plead not guilty, not guilty, not guilty, then appeal, appeal, appeal , then the chase to recover if the judge ruled in your favor. I have personally experienced going to civil court , delays for non compliance until the other party shows up, then judge ruled in my favor, the other party was told to pay up by a certain date. They couldn’t be found. I went back to the courts to have them arrested and was told courts make rulings but don’t have time to hunt down all these derelicts. What am I getting at? This may be a different story here but probably a very tiring long wait to collect anything
Then when it doesn’t get dismissed, they appeal and then appeal again. Seems like we’re waiting til 2028 for this one lol
LG Capital is still trying to get the case against them by the SEC dismissed.
Wednesday, September 20, 2023
52 notice Notice(Other) Wed 09/20 9:52 PM
NOTICE by Daniel Gellman, Boruch Greenberg, LG Capital Funding, LLC, Joseph Lerman re26 MOTION to Dismiss / NOTICE OF DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONS COMPLAINT ,27 Memorandum in Support, NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS (Langer, Philip)
From what I have been told by a friend in the legal system there are only 2 possibilities
where N95 has a snowballs chance in their defense, one being a meritorious defense
of which fails from the very definition when multiple attempts of notification by various legal
means were made to everyone concerned.
So other than everyone claiming insanity that defense is moot.
The other possibility would be excusable neglect, I'm pretty sure that our legal team
and the Arbitration Judge has all of their i's dotted and their T's crossed because
clients are held accountable for the acts and omissions of their attorneys and the
hopes of a judicial mistake appear to be non existent.
N95's default was willful which makes any of the possible defenses unattainable based
on the court documents. The Louisiana courts offers defendants due process via:
Louisiana Constitution Art. 1 Sec.2. No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property,
except by due process of law.
The timeline is not infinite but every opportunity must be given before the court makes their
final judgement, how long depends on the Judge in charge.
So presently the defendants lawyer is going to throw everything including the kitchen sink
at the charges against it's client with the hopes of finding a crack or anything at all.
GOOD LUCK WITH THAT
We now await for the judge to make his ruling.
The wait time here has given me an opportunity to learn a lot about the legal system...LOL
I have been digging into EcoGen, and wow the 140 units in Hilo turned out sweet, I wonder what kind of revenue there
generating now?? I didn't realize that they also distribute medical products to a large number of European pharma companies, the list is on the EcoGen site! What you can find with a little digging!
Plus the absolute final nail IMHO, for good measure,
JAMS SENT NOTIFICATION TO ALL PARTIES:
"On January 12, 2023, JAMS provided written notice to all parties of the scheduling
of a final status teleconference on February 15, 2023, and also notice of the arbitration
hearing on February 22, 2023."
To even attempt to put in writing that they were not notified is laughable, I wish I was
there when the court received that submission to see the EYE ROLL
It's pretty much crystal clear so I think everyone knows that multiple attempts to multiple
defendants and locations were made after reading the Procedural background.
Plausible deniability isn't going to work here.
"Let me root, root, root for the home team,
If they don't win it's a shame.
For it's one, two, three strikes, you're out,
At the old ball game."
They have 3 strikes against them regarding their refusal of notification:
Strike One: Our legal team sent notification via USPS
Strike Two: Our legal team sent notification via Fedex
Strike Three: "The Agreement was executed and mutually exchanged by use of
the DocuSign platform, as indicated by the parties’ electronic signatures on
Exhibit A. See 2/22/23"
I assume this is the take away
“Here is a verification of his signature in a formal federal document , here is the certified USPS tracking information woty signature upon receipt…”.
Your claim of not receiving correspondence is nullified …
There’s no deadline for this ruling correct? Really was wishing it would just be a simple process and take 1 week for a decision.. silly me
Patience is a virtue.... still realllllly wanting to hear some more from Mr. Klug! :)
I know you know what your talking about.
Just remember that a petition to confirm arbitration award is a summary proceeding. It is an expedited proceeding rather than a regular lawsuit. I feel good we will get a quicker ruling compares to our other litigation we had before the Courts. N-95 is fighting an uphill battle. In these type of proceedings, Courts presume that arbitration awards are enforceable and may vacate them only under extraordinarily narrow grounds, which I do not believe they exist in this case. Garnishment or seizure of assets will follow if N-95 fails to comply with Court's confirmation of such judgment.
That’s very good ::: The share structure is paramount. This is the key to the time line. It Has to be done first . If we get the share structure right everything that follows will be so much easier.
I base much of how I trust those in charge here on their thought
process and how it affect us as investors:
"Now, if the SEC wants to focus on ways to help the small borrowers like RedHawk, it should not focus on the lending practices of these “Toxic” lenders, instead, in my opinion, the SEC Enforcement should focus stronger on the egregious exit strategies employed by some of these “Toxic” lenders which simply crush the stock price of these small companies while lenders reap outrageous profits at the expense of stockholders. In fact, we can now provide you with an example wherein a lender altered loan documents in order to increase the number of shares issued upon conversion."
$$$.THIS IS SOMETHING THAT I CAN STAND BEHIND, 100% OF THE TIME.$$$
THE GAMES PLAYED BY TOXIC LENDERS NEED TO BE STOPPED AND
THEY NEED TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE IN A BIG WAY
THERE IS A LOT GOING ON THAT MANY DO NOT KNOW ABOUT
I agree something, is definitely going on
If it is a buyout or merger, I am sure they want/need audited Financials. I would also think they would want the legal issuse cleared up, at a minimum the share structure sorted out.
We wait, but it should be worth it.
Yeppers, I too have that same thought process. Reading everything that I find
gives me a good feeling that there is something brewing, it's just taking a lot
longer than I had thought it would. Personally I have a lot to get done, time
keeps on ticking, we're not getting any younger.
If I was 40 years old I probably wouldn't care as much, each sunrise is
appreciated more and more these days.
I do believe in the company because of the people. Taking the time to know
those involved gives me a good feeling and yes I do expect to see revenue
along with a nice win in the court as an added bonus.
There are many Easter Eggs available in the limited info that they have put
out, once they get whatever it is that is holding them back I do feel at that
point we will know why everything has been taking so long.
Until then we wait
With all the unanswered questions, it might be easier just to skip forward to some plausible answers and see how our history fits these possibilities one by one. Do we really have to wait to start trading again for a court case against an LLC. I don’t think so. The accounting issues have us restricted. Maybe. Waiting to get current. I think we could’ve been current a year ago. But yeah, we did not do that. Why? Is there some sort of merger or buy out in play? Maybe. And why are they playing everything so hush-hush ?interesting. There is definitely 100% something here. Somethings going on. And I can’t help but think it must be good or even great or they would just stop fighting ,stop auditing ,stop everything. But yet they fight on. Something big is brewing. All my humble opinion.
still though... do you believe the company , and or the sales staff . brokers. etc discussed in filings from 2-3 years ago are actively operating and driving revenue... or is SNDD a litigation play at this point?
Free Range Cattle..... tastes better in the end
Yes there truly is a major deficit with our updates, ongoing situations (the last 8K and
reading up on ongoing court cases) are where I get my satisfaction/direction from until
they start releasing news that's all we have unfortunately.
We have no idea why they are not more forthright with info, there must be a reason
because everything that I've seen tells me that they have a plan, I get that from what
I've read so far.