Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Word is that Jake absolutely F'd himself today trying to cheat the system he doesn't know how it works.
It's on now.
$SONG: JAKE NOCH "STREISAND EFFECT" LMAO !!!
Wooo-Hooo! I made the list! 😂🤣
I'd nail your ass for defamation of rattlesnakes!!!!
Wooo-Hooo! I made the list! 😂🤣
I haven't read through this yet... But this may provide some info. And I see the AS was increased to 20 billion just days later.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=16029403&guid=zBQ-kHlLxdifJth
..
.
I just took a gander at the news section for song @ OTCMarkets.... And Holy CRAP! There is a shitload of'em.
Lol
..
.
11-2024-CA-000814-0001-XX
1 04/18/2024 0 Other Circuit Civil
2 04/18/2024 0 Civil Cover Sheet
3 04/18/2024 0 Complaint
4 04/18/2024 0 Standing Order - Circuit
5 04/19/2024 0 Paid $422.50 on receipt 1445169, Fully Paid
6 04/24/2024 0 Notice Of Intent To Serve Subpoena
7 05/01/2024 0 Receipt Revised
8 05/01/2024 0 Receipt Number 1445169 had a refund of $20.50 amount sent to Transnational Matters, PLLC
9 05/01/2024 0 Paid $402.00 on receipt 1445169, Fully Paid
10 05/01/2024 0 Subpoena Issued
11 05/03/2024 0 Notice Of Intent To Serve Subpoena
12 05/03/2024 0 Notice Of Intent To Serve Subpoena
13 05/03/2024 0 Notice Of Intent To Serve Subpoena
14 05/03/2024 0 Notice Of Intent To Serve Subpoena
15 05/03/2024 0 Notice Of Intent To Serve Subpoena
16 05/08/2024 0 Subpoena Issued
17 05/08/2024 0 Subpoena Issued
18 05/08/2024 0 Subpoena Issued
19 05/08/2024 0 Subpoena Issued
20 05/08/2024 0 Subpoena Issued
21 05/09/2024 0 Subpoena Issued
https://cms.collierclerk.com/CMSWeb/#!/casedetails/U7IsW3dDJtj~2FBP5r4GrdUzLDoTwGgmbUAkgJgmt0UJ2Wyp9TUON9FquxMaFK~2FgPhwN4KGdDc1r3ZjhXS7gZ6yg==
I haven't dug into that... So, I don't know.
..
.
I see from the link you circulated that following the change of majority shareholder, NUVG acquired Shares Of Pro Music Rights Class A & B Common Stock From The Jake P. Noch Family Office, LLC on 08/15/2022 with a cost basis
of $382,405,108.25.
My initial thought on reading was wouldn’t it be interesting to see who signed and approved the sale and purchase agreement on behalf of NUVG and what representations and warranties did they seek from the majority shareholder The Jake P. Noch Family Office to fulfil their fiduciary duty as directors to protect the interests of minority NUVG shareholders and what due diligence did the board commission to satisfy themselves that the purchase price of $382,405,108.25 was indeed a fair purchase price ?
I then see online that Pro Music Rights, Inc. announced Jake P. Noch as new CEO of Nuvus Gro Corp (OTC: NUVG) on July 21, 2022 just a few weeks before NUVG acquired PRO for $382,405,108.25.
Am I also right in presuming that the current valuation of PRO Music Rights is now closer to $382 or $382,000 than $382 million ?
35 10/16/2023 0 Order of Dismissal Pro Music Rights Inc, Jake P Noch Family Office Llc Recorded 2023-10-19 Instrument# 6466085
https://cms.collierclerk.com/CMSWeb/#!/casedetails/U7IsW3dDJtj~2FBP5r4GrdU06FJyGRKXzQ~2FP6026r~2FBPGbYY0wtbIbBSULVC4HaHaonchLRuC8~2FVu0r3Ni1pqhEA==
Bingo - you da man !!!
Lets try this again...
https://drive.google.com/file/d/18RZVggjDKcCFqx4u7fsqg7OUkHHEzayt/view
Bingo - that's the one?
OTC Link llc vs Jake
https://drive.google.com/file/d/18RZVggjDKcCFqx4u7fsqg7OUkHHEzayt/view
Search term: OTC Link llc
https://cms.collierclerk.com/CMSWeb/#!/
I believe that may be the one in my post after that.
..
.
Countersuit td ?
Here's Jake vs OTCMarkets arbitration:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/352857/content
These are "attorney written/issued" subpoenas - about as good as used toilet paper.
Moreover- JAKE NOCH has 100% "MADE HIMSELF A PUBLIC FIGURE" and that also makes his "claims" needing to meet a MUCH higher bar - as HE brought this shit storm on himself.
YOU SUE FINRA + THE OTC MARKETS and you just lit your dumb ass up like putting a laser marker on the target in the middle of a firefight LMAO !! The kid ain't the sharpest tool in the RICH DUMB ASSES BORN WITH GOLDEN SPOONS UP THEIR ASS and TRUST FUND FUN BUCKS to play Lawfare R US :)
OTC Link llc vs Jake
https://drive.google.com/file/d/18RZVggjDKcCFqx4u7fsqg7OUkHHEzayt/view
Search term: OTC Link llc
https://cms.collierclerk.com/CMSWeb/#!/
..
.
Here's Jake vs OTCMarkets arbitration:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/352857/content
..
.
the current action is more than a demand letter. it was filed in court and subpoenas issued. they also went to stocktwits, google, wordpress, and 2 to X. my guess is that once jake figures out that his lawyers don't stand a chance in hell, the suit will be withdrawn. if it isn't, it's going to get very expensive for jake.
NOT WORTH CHEAP BOWL OF SOUP n FREE HAIRCUT !!!
i know, right? whatever jake paid for that nonsense was too much.
To carry out the fraud, Lopez and Lefkowitz exploited Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933 C a little-known provision that allows companies to issue unregistered shares of stock to settle "bona fide" debts. Lopez, on behalf of Unico, would enter into purported loan agreements with various shell corporations owned by Lefkowitz, most of which were based in the Turks and Caicos Islands. It was understood by the conspirators that Unico would purposefully default on the loan agreements so that Lefkowitz’s companies could initiate sham lawsuits against Unico.
Each and every one of these sham lawsuits would be brought by Florida-based lawyers in a Sarasota, Florida court. The Florida attorneys, even though they represented opposite sides in the lawsuits, would obtain their pleadings from a single Manhattan-based law firm that oversaw the sham lawsuits. Very soon after each lawsuit was filed C and typically within the very same week C Lopez and Lefkowitz would draft a written settlement agreement. The terms of the written settlement agreement would be extremely favorable to Lefkowitz. In short, Lopez would agree to settle Unico’s debt by issuing unregistered shares of stock worth on average seven times the debt that Unico actually owed. According to a secret side-agreement with Lopez, Lefkowitz would sell the shares on the open market to unsuspecting buyers and kick back a portion of the proceeds to Unico. This kickback would take the form of a new loan C which would have the added benefit of continuing the fraud scheme.
According to the indictment, Lopez also tried to obstruct an SEC probe into his misconduct by refusing to turn over emails, which he printed and concealed in two manila folders marked “Files Deleted” and another marked “Not Released to SEC Subpoena (Delete).” The indictment also alleged that Lopez redacted portions of an email and tried to delete it from his computer, and later lied to the SEC under oath during deposition testimony.
it should be noted that if ihub felt compelled to release personal information, they would first notify the user and give that user the opportunity to quash.
Anyone know anything about this?
https://x.com/BasileEsq/status/1788914545940926511
Folks on Jakes list might want too check out the Public Citizen link in that link as well.
https://www.citizen.org/article/internet-free-speech/
https://www.citizen.org/topic/justice-the-courts/case-library/?s_tax_case_topic[0]=112&s_tax_case_topic[1]=113&s_tax_case_topic[]=114
..
.
i know, right? whatever jake paid for that nonsense was too much.
They threatened to file a complaint with the Better Business Bureau....
Lol.
..
.
they will respond to the court appropriately.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/legal_subpoena.aspx
What is ihub doing this time?
in 2019 he tried a demand letter. ihub said no and that was that.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/heyly8v5nq2v90g/iHub%20Letter.pdf?e=4&dl=0
I find things highly peculiar: 1). Would not the initial step be to report the threats to the FBI and additional law enforcement authorities and let them handle any subpoenas quietly rather than alert the alleged perpetrators and give them advance warning? Would not this be the logical, prudent, and effective method to handle this? It seems broadcasting it all over the internet is counterproductive to the stated goals. 2). I am not an attorney but if I go to court I always write my own court documents and then compare them with the attorney prior to filing so relevant material, legal points, or strategy are not missed. I would not go ahead and ask for these subpoenas if law enforcement did not find these threats credible in the first place. However, assuming I was going to take this additional step against my own better judgement, I always use exhibits prominently to support my court documents. I find it highly unusual there are no exhibits. My initial exhibits would have been reports to various law enforcement authorities. I then would have immediately followed with exhibits documenting and evidencing these alleged threats. Again, I have no legal "training" but that is how I handle things and how my thought process works. I do not even see any evidence of a sworn statement by anyone of these alleged threats.
Am I missing anything?
I look forward to anyone's thoughts, ideas, comments, or criticisms. Thank you.
I hope no one is taking offense. But I am finding this Jake individual a very comical character, essentially to the point, I find it almost hard to believe he exists in real life. This is great comedy to me and I wonder how everyone from his attorneys, to the rapping gang members, to any of his associates hold back the laughter when talking to him, and dealing with him, and his insipid requests and antics. It's embarrassing too for them really. I haven't laughed this hard in a while. I would love to meet the individual who did the podcast interviewing him and ask them how they kept a straight face throughout that interview. I would have broken completely and burst out laughing in the first few minutes. I've got my buy orders in.
In the two videos he blames OTCM for not allowing the TA to update, then admits he has strategically allowed the TA to make updates 1-2 times to reflect the share retirements. Of course, he was busy selling ~750M shares from his accounts.
Nochless said the OTCMARKETS gagged his TA, not him. That’s what in the video.
I laughed at the part where he infers his company is THE ONES that go around and collect license fees.
He’s never heard of BMI or ASCAP
Even Jake himself making a few unexpected brief but golden contributions to the iHub platform discovery process earlier this month
Im looking forward to my lawyers telling him in court we used to have 2 hamsters 🐹 and 3 rabbits 🐇 and 3 dogs 🐕 so I shouldn’t be on his list or is that not as good a defence as once having a single guinea pig 🐹 ?
Seriously Jake if you are reading this stop this madness now and immediately withdraw your quest to get the confidential data of 300 plus apparently randomly named social media users before you discover you have 300 plus counter claims heading your way
I've seen it's around 2.5 - 3 billion dumped. Nobody knows for sure; the TA is gagged. The AS is 14.5 billion per Nevada SOS, not 2 billion.
..
.
Little bit of a conflict of interest? Lol... Conspiracy? Some fraud on top? I was just looking at that suit last night and was wonder, what the heck???
There is a lot of good ammo for lawsuits against these clowns. Probably much, much, more as well.
Discovery is going to be a real bitch for Jake and this attorney.
.
Buyer Beware
Pump and Dump
..
Did ya'll see this?
Jake used "a" lawyer with zero understanding of securities law (evidenced by your severe violations of Rule 144 and the 3a10 exemption) and then they both bragged about their misdeeds on social media platforms.
Here is his lawyer, proud of forcing Jake's own company to illegally pay out in unrestricted shares in violation of the 3a10 exemption rules which does not allow affiliates:
But wait... he wasn't Jake's lawyer... he was the COMPANY'S lawyer and his obligations were that of protecting the company from fraud and unjust settlements. Jake already had a convertible note for $12M plus expenses. The company was never obligated to pay cash. What Jake and Jake's... I mean... the "company's lawyer" did was defraud the courts to get an illegal 3a10 exemption so Jake could use company stock as an open bank account.
Why would the lawyer representing the company, tasked with the company' best interest, be bragging about getting a family office free trading shares on LinkedIn? It is because Jake was the lead on both sides and all parties were paid by him for one outcome, to illegally defraud the courts to obtain a 3a10 settlement for an affiliate (not allowed).
The conflict of interest is so clear you could see the bottom of the ocean.
Guys... I don't think this is what Jake was hoping for with the SLAPP lawsuits... an almost dead iHub board is now a ragging inferno of inconvenient truth.
I did not know he had inheritance. That fills out the missing parts of the story. Nochless didn’t have nice things to say about OTCMarkets denying him access to certain feature of his public reporting and updates from the TA reporting the outstanding shares.
I am a newbie to this room, did he dilute SONG ?
OK. so it boils down to this:.
SONG = SCAM
JAKE P. NOCH ------------->Prison + disgorgement + restitution + civil and criminole asset forfeiture (which cannot be discharged in bankruptcy).
JAKE's life trajectory: living with mom in her Naples house and expecting a nice inheritance -----------------> prison ----------> living in a shitbox apartment in Imokalee with a non- dischargeable court judgement that will take every Dollar and property that he will ever inherit or otherwise obtain. A financial death sentence just like iHub founder Matt got only much larger..
Stupid kid shit. Starting life with a felony CONviction and a monster asset forfeiture judgement is no way to go thru the one life you get. Ask Matt.
JAKE P. NOCH = dumbfuck who pissed away his freedom and a multimillion Dollar inheritance trying to "be somebody" to assuage an insatiable ego and a fundamentally weak personality..
That is all.
,
The Good Life:
We've got to buy Homwbrew a few beers:
A user by the name of “Homebrew”, who has been a registered member since October 29, 2013 has referred to my client and his endeavors in various iHub posts as “failure...crap...zombie... [a] pump and dump "...and as not making any financial sense. Specifically, this user referred to my client as “Jake-the-snake dude scammer... as an insult to snakes” that would “screw with investors"
My money also says, this very moment, he is 😭crying😭 to Mommy to make people stop and make it all go away. I'm going to have my buy orders in at the opening with a crack CEO like this one.
"To ensure a seamless transition, I will be actively involved in selecting a new CEO who can bring a fresh perspective and the necessary expertise to lead the company into its next chapter."
READ THIS FOLKS Td NAILS IT
If FINRA said it could take over 14 months, then that very likely means they are doing a full-blown investigation. And, I think he should have said 14 months to make a decision on whether they would process the RS
FINRA does not "approve" reverse splits. They process them. Unless they suspect FRAUD.
And to correct my typo... It was 14,500,000,000 AS
(3) Deficiency Determination
In circumstances where an SEA Rule 10b-17 Action or Other Company-Related Action is deemed deficient, the Department may determine that it is necessary for the protection of investors, the public interest and to maintain fair and orderly markets, that documentation related to such SEA Rule 10b-17 Action or Other Company-Related Action will not be processed. In instances where the Department makes such a deficiency determination, the request to process documentation related to the SEA Rule 10b-17 Action or Other Company-Related Action, as applicable, will be closed, subject to paragraphs (d)(4) and (e) of this Rule. The Department shall make such deficiency determinations solely on the basis of one or more of the following factors: (1) FINRA staff reasonably believes the forms and all supporting documentation, in whole or in part, may not be complete, accurate or with proper authority; (2) the issuer is not current in its reporting requirements, if applicable, to the SEC or other regulatory authority; (3) FINRA has actual knowledge that the issuer, associated persons, officers, directors, transfer agent, legal adviser, promoters or other persons connected to the issuer or the SEA Rule 10b-17 Action or Other Company-Related Action are the subject of a pending, adjudicated or settled regulatory action or investigation by a federal, state or foreign regulatory agency, or a self-regulatory organization; or a civil or criminal action related to fraud or securities laws violations; (4) a state, federal or foreign authority or self-regulatory organization has provided information to FINRA, or FINRA otherwise has actual knowledge indicating that the issuer, associated persons, officers, directors, transfer agent, legal adviser, promoters or other persons connected with the issuer or the SEA Rule 10b-17 Action or Other Company-Related Action may be potentially involved in fraudulent activities related to the securities markets and/or pose a threat to public investors; and/or (5) there is significant uncertainty in the settlement and clearance process for the security.
(4) Notice Regarding Determination
If the Department determines that a request to process documentation related to a SEA Rule 10b-17 Action or a Other Company-Related Action is deficient, FINRA staff shall provide written notice to the Requesting Party. Any notice issued under this paragraph shall state the specific factor(s) that caused the request to be deemed deficient and the Requesting Party may appeal a determination pursuant to paragraph (e) of this Rule.
(5) Notice Issuance
A notice issued under this paragraph shall be issued by facsimile or electronic mail, or pursuant to Rule 9134.
(e) Request for an Appeal to Subcommittee of Uniform Practice Code Committee
A Requesting Party issued a notice under this Rule may appeal a determination made under paragraph (d)(3) of this Rule to a three-member subcommittee composed of current or former industry members of FINRA's Uniform Practice Code Committee in writing via electronic mail, unless an alternative method of service is ordered by the Adjudicator, within seven calendar days after service of the notice. Service of the appeal by electronic mail shall be deemed complete upon sending. The written request for an appeal must be accompanied by proof of payment of the non-refundable Action Determination Appeal Fee. A request for an appeal must set forth with specificity any and all defenses to the Department's determination that a request was unacceptable or otherwise deficient. An appeal to the subcommittee shall operate to stay the processing of the company-related action (i.e., the requested company-related action shall not be processed during the period that the Requesting Party requests an appeal or while any such appeal is pending). Once a written appeal has been received, the Requesting Party may submit any additional supporting written documentation via electronic mail, unless an alternative method of service is ordered by the Adjudicator, up until the time the appeal is considered by the subcommittee. The subcommittee shall convene once each calendar month to consider all appeals received under this Rule during the prior month. The subcommittee shall render a determination within three business days following the day the appeal is considered by the subcommittee. The subcommittee's determination shall constitute final action by FINRA. The subcommittee's determination shall not constitute an estoppel as to FINRA nor bind FINRA in any subsequent administrative, civil, or disciplinary proceeding. If the Requesting Party fails to file a written request for an appeal within seven calendar days after service of the notice by the Department, the Department's determination shall constitute final action by FINRA.
Mr. Noch intends to remain in his current position until the completion of the reverse stock split and other strategic initiatives, including the appointment and training of new CEO(s) and other executive team members. His Family Office, through a court-approved 3(a)(10) exemption arrangement, will continue to play an integral role in funding the company’s operations, ensuring the maintenance of salaries, including Mr. Noch’s own salary, to avoid triggering the severance package outlined in the court-approved agreement. Mr. Noch aims to be classified as a Non-affiliate to ensure operational stability and will encourage the acquisition of royalty stakes using the court-approved 3(a)(10) exemption in his employment agreement.
**LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS FROM THE DESK OF JAKE P. NOCH**
Dear Valued Shareholders,
I trust this message finds you well. It is with a profound sense of responsibility and after considerable introspection that I share a momentous decision that will profoundly impact the future trajectory of Music Licensing, Inc.
This decision has not been arrived at lightly, and I have taken the time to delve deep into the heart of our company’s journey. It is with sincere introspection that I’ve come to the realization that my role as the founder and CEO may not be the best fit for the evolving needs and aspirations of Music Licensing, Inc. Despite my unwavering belief in the company’s potential, I acknowledge with humility that I’ve fallen short of the ambitious goals I set for myself.
After careful consideration, I’ve made the difficult choice to step down as CEO. This decision is not a hasty one; rather, it is a result of a prolonged and thoughtful examination of what is in the best interests of Music Licensing, Inc. and, by extension, its valued shareholders. To ensure a seamless transition, I will be actively involved in selecting a new CEO who can bring a fresh perspective and the necessary expertise to lead the company into its next chapter.
Followers
|
175
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
10373
|
Created
|
02/04/11
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators tdbowieknife Dragon Lady |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |