Max Sound Corporation (MAXD)

[J Galt]

I don’t think shareholders who have lost millions are amused by anything connected to MAXD. Especially words I post on the boards. It is not my intention and I am not looking to amuse people, simply to post facts and truths. I also don’t think anyone is amused when the board poster ends so many sentences with “lol.” Nothing about this company is a laughing matter. Unless you want to include Hapern’s delusional opinion of himself and his lifestyle. That is laughable.

A great number of “smart investors” lost money in this company because they believed in the technology and the management. They are not amused by anything being posted on the boards. Many lost their investment because they believed in me, and my word. I will carry that burden until the day I die as the money is unrecoverable, as is, in some cases, the trust. What am I doing about it? I’m speaking out. I’m countering the lies I fell for years ago with the truth. Maybe shareholders and potential investors will not follow down the same path I chose. I have a moral compass and I’m ashamed of getting people involved in MAXD. Halpern has no such moral compass and instead feeds his individual ego with fantasies, false promises, and images of an undeserving lifestyle. His “Hatfield’s vs the McCoy’s” style websites are despicable and employ a strategy that is beneath contempt and borderline criminal.

I think everyone here can read the digital tea leaves. The board poster leaves no doubt where he stands with MAXD and with Greg Halpern. Words such as “team” and “camp” are a way of describing an allegiance to a concept, idea, or agenda. Comments made by each one of the members who post on this board generally indicate what their opinions are and whether they side with one agenda or another. Including the board poster himself.

[jay14]

You couldn't be more wrong with this statement....
Everyone knows the board poster is in the Halpern camp, or “team”

I am a shareholder who answered a question years ago,
and
it was assumed
I was on team Halpern....

When it was bad transfer agent,
that made me team Halpern....

Just because one is a smart investor
and takes profits,
then defends management everyone assumes that,
that person is on a special team lol....

Bad actor's with magpie dissecting adjectives
that fill the message boards,
with amusement for all to laugh along with is all I'm reading....

Btw
MAXD shareholders are still waiting for
Harvey Vechery to release a statement,
which should of been released May 1!!!!

[J Galt]

Most opinions are biased. Everyone knows the board poster is in the Halpern camp, or “team” if you will, and not only shares Halpern’s opinions, but also promotes them and seldom changes his mind. Is that not being biased?

Everyone who reads my posts also understands I am biased. However, they also know my opinions are based on facts and logic. It’s much easier being biased when you are backed with the truth. Unlike Halpern. I’ve posted about this before so no use wasting time elaborating. It’s just a reminder as the board poster seems to be using the “biased” defense again.

As to the concept of the board poster “letting” the shareholders “read the websites” by posting the links, be careful what you wish for. Most shareholders will not see the wisdom in Halpern attacking Harvey Vechery in this way as it is not only distasteful, but it will also anger the Vechery group. Halpern may need to be reminded that Vechery has money and a large legal firm at his disposal. Halpern has neither.

[J Galt]

"Must hurt to be wrong so many times... " That’s funny considering the source. Being wrong never hurts me. I just dive into research, find the proof, and adjust my thinking as needed. Unlike Halpern, who ignores reality and uses Formula Four Protocols to convince himself that fiction is fact.

By using that distorted logic, I am wrong. The court is wrong. The judge is wrong. The lawyers are wrong. Harvey is wrong. The shareholders are wrong. Everyone is always wrong and Greg Halpern is always right. Where is there any evidence of that being true? Once again, try copying and pasting my comments and let’s debate. Show me where I have been “wrong” so many times.

[jay14]

My team????lol

I'm a MAXD shareholder
that is letting shareholders,

read the websites

that bias opinions are being posted about,
because of bad transfer agent's had been duped 14 plus years ago....

[MD1941]

Did your team forget about the SEC complaint that they filed? Team Halpern has the same selective memory problems that Nash has.

[jay14]

Must hurt to be wrong so many times...

[jay14]

I don't know what you're talking about....

Noisemakers always saying that they're calling the SEC!!!!

Okay call them,
again
and
see where that goes!!!!
Nothing burger
whereas
GH might have something with 1934&1935 Acts
under 10b-5....

[J Galt]

“Ex, censored transfer agents actions are highly illegal and in violation of the 1933 and 1934 Acts under 10b-5.” Does the board poster not see the irony in this comment?

“SEC Rule 10b-5, states that it is illegal for any person to defraud or deceive someone, including through the misrepresentation of material information, with respect to the sale or purchase of a security.”

The person who should be concerned with this law is Greg Halpern. He is the master of defrauding and deceiving shareholders. He is the one who has a $8 million dollar judgment against him from Z-Trim shareholders for fraud, not a former MAXD transfer agent who was NEVER CENSORED!

Halpern is the one who was removed by the judge, and I quote; “Halpern has engaged in conduct in his capacity as a director of defendant Max Sound constituting fraudulent or dishonest acts or gross abuse of authority or discretion with reference to the corporation.”

Halpern is the king of “misrepresentation of material information.” Do I need to start another list of all the ways Halpern has defrauded shareholders? I can’t understand why the board poster believed this “10b-5 act” had anything to do with the ex-transfer agent’s actions. Once again, look in the mirror and post what you see.

By the way, the board poster can be as “sure” as he wants to be, but Greg Halpern and Harvey Vechery are not talking.

[MD1941]

What happened to Halpern's original SEC complaint?

[jay14]

Bad transfer agent's complain and still waiting to hear from SEC,
because either laziness as set in
or
there's nothing there as
SEC told them....

I'm not sure not my issue
but
SEC might be getting notification!!!!

[jay14]

It's Only Fair

Same goes with bias opinions....

[MD1941]

Please call the SEC!

[J Galt]

“It's only fair!!!!” Comments posted on an uncontrolled and unmonitored website can be problematic. Especially when statements are made by someone with an axe to grind and a personal agenda of self-promotion and personal wealth. Halpern is challenging Harvey Vechery to sue him, and he already has, as well as employing extortion tactics in an attempt to get Vechery to cave to his demands.

I have no problem with shareholders reading the website as I have already heard the reactions from those that do. Why anyone would consider the comments to be flattering to Halpern is the point he needs to consider from his end. It’s not a good look. That being said, let the shareholders make their own minds up. I have never had a problem with that process. It’s others who appear to be infatuated with the censorship of thought, not me.

[jay14]

So, what is the next step? Extortion.

No,
let's hope not!!!!
I'm pretty sure HV and GH are talking
however
from what I'm reading
ex, censored transfer agents actions are highly illegal
and in violation of the
1933 and 1934 Acts under 10b-5
among other things....

[jay14]

It's interesting because MAXD shareholders
should see what is being said....

Harvey Vechery's minions continue with the agenda,

so let shareholders read the websites....

It's only fair!!!!

[J Galt]

Halpern’s game plan has always been to sue Harvey Vechery claiming collusion and conspiracy between Vechery and “minions.” First, he tried a class action suit that no one signed on for. Then he made noises about suing Vechery for a variety of reasons. This would take money that Halpern doesn’t have.

So, what is the next step? Extortion. In the world of social media, it’s easy to dox someone by posting photos of his house and business information. “Doxing” is “the search for and publish private or identifying information about (a particular individual) on the internet, typically with malicious intent.” Haplern stated, “OTHER SITES WILL BE SOON DEVELOPED AND RELEASED IF NECESSARY DEVOTED TO HARVEYS, MANY RECORDED, DISTORTIONS, DECEPTIONS, AND OUTRIGHT LIES.”

Once again, this is classic extortion. Designed to intimidate Vechery into paying money to Halpern in exchange for taking down the websites and agreeing not to publish any more information. Otherwise Vechery's business and personal life will be negatively impacted. And for some reason this board poster believes this is something Halpern should be proud of? Posted words that are interesting? I guess it would be, in the dime story novel tradition.

[J Galt]

“Interesting read?” A site filled with defamation of character, slander, and libel might be considered “interesting” to some, but not to most thinking people.

That aside, the posted link will provide readers a window into the distorted world of Greg Halpern. No one cares about his accomplishments from years ago. All that matters is his complete and total failure as the man in charge of MAXD for 14 years. The fact that he ran the company into the ground and “looted the shareholders” in the process is more relevant than his personal life. His favorite deserts and family trips in the RV are not something shareholders who have lost millions of dollars care to see. Nor are photos of him standing next to a supposedly “new” car impressing anyone.

All three amateurish websites are nothing more than an extortion attempt to get money out of Harvey Vechery. “Either give me money or I’ll register more websites!” Every shareholder who has read the postings on the websites and then contacted me has stated the same thing; the transparency of Halpern’s efforts is patently obvious.

[jay14]

Thanks for the input of information....

I had no knowledge of this about the Noisemakers....
19 times???? lol

http://hoodWinkersexposed.com

[jay14]

WOW, this is our new leadership....
http://keybrandsinternational.com

[jay14]

Yes, interesting read that shows such a wide selection....
https://harveyvechery.com/

[J Galt]

“OTHER SITES WILL BE SOON DEVELOPED AND RELEASED IF NECESSARY DEVOTED TO HARVEYS, MANY RECORDED, DISTORTIONS, DECEPTIONS, AND OUTRIGHT LIES.” This is nothing more than a not so veiled threat to Harvey Vechery. In effect, Halpern is saying “either meet my monetary demands or more websites filled with defamation, libel, and slander will be registered and posted.” It’s just another form of financial extortion. Why would releasing information on these new sites be “necessary” for the shareholders to know? It has nothing to do with MAXD so why does Halpern think posting these recordings is germane to the future of MAXD? Once again, this is Halpern’s sleazy way of doing business. I don’t recall reading a chapter in the Formula Four Protocols defining intimidation, blackmail, and extortion as the pathway to human enlightenment.

[J Galt]

“I TOOK AN EXCLUSIVE LICENSE AND THE RIGHT TO SELL IT IN EARLY 2023 IN EXCHANGE FOR SOME OF THE SEVEN FIGURES THE COMPANY OWED ME BEFORE VECHERY GOT THE COURT.”

All MAXD assets were committed to Harvey Vechery by notes and Halpern had no right to even claim the asset, much less propose to sell it. This is just another Halpern fraud. Granting a “license to self” based on false dollars he claimed were owed to him by the company. What about notes due to Harvey Vechery from both MAXD and Greg Halpern personally? Wouldn’t that have cancelled out any supposed notes due from MAXD to Halpern?

The board of directors didn’t approve this deal because there was no board of directors. There has been no board oversight since John Blaisure was terminated. Which, by the way, was over the false valuation, interest, and accrual process Halpern was using in the filings. Blaisure demanded Halpern address that process and refused to sign the SEC filings until it was changed. Instead, Halpern terminated Blaisure as CEO, appointed himself as the new CEO, signed and submitted the SEC forms, and then continued piling on the interest.

John Blaisure’s concern prior to his termination has now become a reality. Blaisure was confident, based on years of experience working with Halpern, that Greg was going to use that artificial debt he was accruing sometime in the future to defraud the shareholders. That’s why he demanded that Halpern stop accruing interest and adjust the filings. Greg refused, Blaisure was terminated, and here we are. What is Halpern now attempting? He is claiming he gave himself the rights to patented technology so he can spin it into a new company and commence enticing investors to pony up for the ride.

This is the “golden parachute” Halpern has awarded himself on the way out the MAXD door. The problem with that thought process is that it’s not legal. All the MAXD patents, trademarks, and technology has been pledged to Harvey Vechery in exchange for notes. All the assets of the company are owned by Harvey Vechery.

Let’s examine the words of the Honorable Judge Timothy Taylor in relation to what Greg Halpern has just claimed. “Halpern has engaged in conduct in his capacity as a director of defendant Max Sound constituting fraudulent or dishonest acts or gross abuse of authority or discretion with reference to the corporation.” And this further statement, “Halpern’s Misrepresentations Regarding the Business of Max Sound.” And finally, this is the key reference in regard to Halpern’s comments yesterday on the Hoodwinkers and HV sites, “Halpern Does Not Adhere to Corporate Formalities and Operates Max Sound in Order to Loot Max Sound and its Shareholders.” That is exactly what Halpern is doing by claiming he has granted himself the rights to the technology, LOOTING THE SHAREHOLDERS! Technology that belongs to Harvey Vechery and the shareholders, not Greg Halpern. Furthermore, no legitimate company will ever do business with Greg Halpern, MAXD Audio Biometric patent thievery or not, because his track record is now well known and documented in court cases. All it takes is a simple Google search to realize the long trail of financial tears Halpern has left in his wake.

One final point, granting a license is a material event. If this transaction was completed “in early 2023…before Vechery got the court,” as Halpern stated, then where was the required SEC 8-K for a material event? Halpern was in charge and responsible for all filings up until the court removed him on May 18th retroactive to April 28th. The judgment was issued on January 11th. When did this supposed transaction take place? Before January 11th? Before April 28th? Before May 18th? Again, where was the 8-K for this material event? I think we can all read the tea leaves here and see the obvious. This was a retroactive transaction, illegally transferring assets to Halpern, via an arm’s length self-serving transaction, which is not only illegal, but involving technology already owned by Vechery through defaulted notes.

To summarize, Greg Halpern has retroactively granted himself, after a judgment and Final Order was granted to Harvey Vechery, the exclusive rights to license and sell an asset owned by the company and committed to Vechery as collateral on notes from Vechery to MAXD and Halpern personally. Again, interplanetary Pleiadean law will not be upheld by the US court system and Halpern will have to forfeit this self-serving deal. Halpern’s days of looting the shareholders of MAXD are over.

[J Galt]

“I LEFT A LICENSE WITH MAX-D FOR FUTURE SHAREHOLDER BENEFIT.”

This is rich. When has Halpern ever done anything for the shareholders? The MAXD track record clearly shows that every move by Halpern was for his personal benefit. If he truly had an offer of millions of dollars for the patent, he would have made the deal…for the benefit of himself.

If Halpern truly cared about the shareholders, he could have used that revenue to jump start his imaginary gold mining operation he’d been selling them on. Or invigorate his plush bunny operation. Or develop his imaginary Mexican Land Deal. He could have gone back to Harvey Vechery and shown him he actually could turn water into wine and begged for another chance. He didn’t turn the offer into a positive for MAXD shareholders as there was no offer for millions of dollars. Instead, he retroactively gave himself an “exclusive license and the right to sell” a patent that didn’t belong to him. Always thinking of number one.

[J Galt]

“ONE OF THEIR MAJOR PARTNERS OFFERED ME MILLIONS FOR PATENTED MAX-D BIOMETRIC AUDIO WHICH I TURNED DOWN LAST YEAR BECAUSE IT IS REVOLUTIONARY AND WORTH A LOT MORE.” Lloyd Trammell patented the biometric Audio Security for MAXD, but it is just a technical shell and was never completed. It is an unproven theory. A development partner would be needed to prove it out. An OEM with a platform to attempt to make the process work. On top of that, it would take software engineers familiar with the MAXD code because it’s just a theory. It would also take money to perfect. None of which Halpern has access to. At this point in time, it is nothing more than a patent. There has been no advance engineering completed on the technology, so it is not “revolutionary and worth a lot more” than the “millions” Halpern was supposedly offered.

Based on the level of self-serving greed Halpern has always exhibited, combined with his current desperate financial situation, does anyone really believe he would have passed on the offer of millions of dollars for an unfinished and unproven technology? That would be like a parched and dying man crawling in the Sahara being offered lifesaving well water at the oasis and instead holding out for a bottle of Perrier. Would never happen. Survive first, thrive later.

By the way, has anyone offered millions of dollars for the “Proprietary MAXD Mineral Mapping Technology?” The way Halpern endlessly promoted this imaginary mining technology, and how he is still claiming there is viability to the mining deals, one would have to think it was much more valuable than an unproven concept technology. By Halpern choosing audio over mining, it validates our claim that the mining deals were never real to begin with.

[J Galt]

Another preposterous claim from Greg Halpern just appeared on his website; “I INVENTED AUTOMATED SEO IN 1997. ALTA VISTA ENGINEERS INTEGRATED THE TECH INTO WHAT GOOGLE ABSORBED IN THE EARLY 2000S.” This incredibly bold and egotistical statement was just added to the Halpern Hoodwinkers and HV websites. The purpose appears to be a way to imply that Halpern was using his own quarter century old invention to now attack Harvey Vechery online, and that’s supposed to be ironic, or representing the Halpernian cycle of life. Who knows? But truth is important when measuring the man. I went searching for the truth online, using Google’s search engine of course.

So, Greg Halpern claims to have invented SEO, which is Search Engine Optimization, in 1997. A quick Google search states the following: “In 1997, the Webstep Marketing Agency was the first group to use the phrase “search engine optimization” in their marketing materials. And around 1998, Danny Sullivan, founder of Search Engine Watch, started popularizing the term and helping clients optimize their content to rank well in search engine results.” However, the origin of SEO goes back further.

“It is believed that SEO was born in 1991. Around this time, the world’s first website was launched, and one quickly turned into many as websites crowded the internet. So, there was a huge need for structure and accessibility, and the world’s first search engines were created. In 1993, Excite revolutionized how information was categorized, and in 1994, Alta Vista, Yahoo, and others joined the scene. However, in 1996, SEO really took off when Sergey Brin and Larry Page began building what would become the biggest, most recognized search engine to date: BackRub. Thought I was going to say Google? Well, you’re right because BackRub eventually became Google and was registered as a domain in 1997.”

“AltaVista was a Web search engine established in 1995. It became one of the most-used early search engines, but lost ground to Google and was purchased by Yahoo! in 2003, which retained the brand, but based all AltaVista searches on its own search engine. On July 8, 2013, the service was shut down by Yahoo!.”

There are numerous links to “the origin of SEO” on the Google page and I followed each one. I then went to the AltaVista link, a Palo Alto, CA company, and read their history. There was never a mention of Greg Halpern’s name appearing anywhere on any of these sites, or in any of my searches. You would think the “inventor” of the concept would at least have a passing mention, or any credit at all to the “idea man.” Once again, without proof, this is nothing more than Greg Halpern attempting to remain relevant and his pathological need to be the center of attention.

Unless Halpern has proof that he invented SEO, and I’m more than happy to read all about it if he provides it, this appears to be nothing more than another wild Halpern claim. If not, point me in the right direction and I’ll post the information.

[J Galt]

Greg Halpern is once again posting defamatory comments on his Hoodwinkers and HV websites. Although I’m trying to stay away from negativity and ancient history, these posts by Halpern were just included yesterday on his websites so I feel compelled to respond.

I had to laugh when I saw Greg portraying himself as a “superhero,” in caricature form, on his new website. On one side you have Harvey Vechery’s photo with the sophomoric insult attached as the heading, on the other side you have “Superhero Halpern” with the offer of a “free poster” at the bottom of the imaginary comic book cover. A free poster of superhero Halpern. The entire production speaks volumes about the character, or lack thereof, on display for all to see. Not to mention the classic narcissism.

This is a typical statement from Greg Halpern. “NEXT UP, HARVEY RECORDED HIMSELF TELLING ME….” Harvey was not “recording himself.” He was not talking into a microphone or holding a recording device. He was not being interviewed on a podcast. He was talking into a phone, mistakenly trusting Halpern to follow the standard rules of business by assuming it was a controlled conversation, and Halpern was illegally recording him without his knowledge or authorization. This action is not only unethical and immoral, but also illegal in California. “Cal. Penal Code § 632(a). Under California law, it is a crime punishable by fine and/or imprisonment to record a confidential conversation without the consent of all parties, or without a notification of the recording to the parties via an audible beep at specific intervals.”

[J Galt]

"This poster is making the claim...." Everything I said in the post featured on the link is true. Everything. Greg Halpern was removed by court order and is no longer the CEO. Harvey Vechery was granted everything he requested in the Relief Order issued on April 28th and Final Order issued on May 18th. Harvey Vechery is the decision maker for MAXD and not Greg Halpern. Vechery is listening to his legal, financial, and technical advisors as he moves forward. All shareholders are waiting for those decisions to be made public.

[jay14]

Try reading, or are you afraid to ask this poster,
knowing the answer????
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172119453

[grantastic]

So you can't prove Vechery is in charge? Didn't think so.

[jay14]

It may sound repetitive, but
you're asking the wrong person....

This poster is making the claim....

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172119453

[grantastic]

All the crooks in this stage drama are pointing the finger at each other.

good luck waiting for anyone to take responsibility!!

As a shareholder, I'm looking to the leadership to get out filings. Regardless of the status of the previous executive, where are they?

[grantastic]

Prove it

Harvey Vechery
is new leadership....

[J Galt]

“MaxSoundly guarding hypocrisy!” This is funny coming from a board poster who has been blindly “guarding” Halpern on both chat boards for years. Why was there no demand for answers from Halpern for any of his outlandish claims? The bogus mining numbers that did not add up? The Mexican Land Deal with a valuation of $57 million dollars? Beluga car? The short squeeze? Zimbabwean gold infused dollars? 50 deals in 50 days, and the list goes on.

Why wasn’t the “where are they” question asked when Halpern didn’t file for three quarters? His fantastical 8-K? When Halpern stated he was only going to file an extension on May 19th instead of having the major update he promised? When he intentionally took the company down the back alleys to the Expert Market? Any of those worth asking, “where are they?”

There are no earnings to report, yet posters are demanding the reports be filed. The key is no one can buy or sell, other than with specific traders, until the company is off the Expert Market and back on OTC. That is a process that takes time and is not a given that it will even be allowed. Again, where was the concern for the location of the filings at that point in time?

Hypocrisy? Show me where there is evidence of hypocrisy in my posts. If there was no guarded “hypocrisy” in shareholders not asking where the filings were for Halpern, there can be none now with the new group.

[Utuse]

MaxSoundly guarding hypocrisy!

As a shareholder, I'm looking to the leadership to get out filings. Regardless of the status of the previous executive, where are they?

[J Galt]

Greg Halpern had not completed the required SEC filings for three quarters. He filed a ridiculous 8-K. He was planning on filing an extension before he was shut down by the court. He intentionally took MAXD to the Expert Market to force Vechery’s hand. He was running out the statute of limitations to avoid forensic accounting. He has a long track record of running pump and dump schemes that only work out for people on the list. He’s been running the company as his personal cash cow for years and “looting the shareholders,” according to the judge. If anyone is responsible for the SEC potentially “suspending this ticker” it is Greg Halpern, not Harvey Vechery.

By the way, to the question the board poster asked about this comment, “SEC is destined to suspend this ticker soon Okay!!!!,” the first question I would ask is why is this board poster excited about the SEC suspending the stock? Does Halpern think this leaves him off the hook? Hardly.

The SEC does not publicly announce when there is an ongoing investigation. I personally know of several shareholders who filed complaints with the SEC in the past and others have openly stated on the Yahoo board that they have been communicating with the SEC, as well as the DOJ, about Greg Halpern and MAXD. Does that mean the SEC is going to suspend MAXD? I have no idea. In all honesty. It’s entirely possible as there are certainly issues with the way Greg Halpern did business, but none of us have any way of knowing what they are going to do, or if they are even considering it. The government moves slowly, especially the SEC.

Is the potential for an SEC suspension a concern for the Vechery legal team? I would imagine it would be. I’m sure that’s one of the many things they are dealing with when Halpern ran the good ship MAXD aground on Vechery’s doorstep.

[J Galt]

Back from the beach and catching up. A few points to consider from recent posts, when making comments about who is in charge and SEC filing dates, you must look at the big picture. Greg Halpern was in charge from the beginning until he was removed by the courts backdated to April 28th. He is no longer the CEO. That is public knowledge. Until that point in time Harvey Vechery was limited in what he could legally do.

As I have stated repeatedly, the Vechery legal team was not allowed to look “under the hood” until the end of the day May 18th as Halpern was suggesting online that he was going to file a “motion to reconsider” and fight the verdict. The legal examination for the Vechery team began the following day on May 19th. At that time, they started investigating the overall condition of the company and began the legal “forensic” process. Over the course of the next several weeks they discovered issues that needed to be dealt with, financial, legal, and technical. This led to an ongoing discovery process behind the scenes. I’m sure they will address the shareholders when they are ready. Working with the SEC, including issues of past due and current filings and reports, is part of the process.

In the meantime, what has Greg Halpern been doing? He registered a website in Harvey Vechery’s name and began posting more defamatory comments about Vechery and other individuals. He then registered the Vechery company name and bragged about it on the new website. He posted photos of Harvey Vechery’s house on the website and legal proceedings from a past family court action. He modified his Hoodwinkers website and continued with the libel and slander campaign from his other sites. He and his minions posted negative information about Vechery on the boards and issued veiled threats, including talk of potential class action awsuits. He then began posting that Vechery and Halpern were in “live talks” about the Japan business, working things out, and moving on together, which never happened. This was apparently posted on a foreign website after presumably doctoring illegal audio recordings of prior phone conversations, probably edited to appear as if they were current.

These actions were all against the court ruling which prevented “defendant Halpern, and anyone acting in concert with him, are permanently enjoined and restrained from, directly or indirectly, by use of any means or instrumentalities: Making false statements about his relationship with Max Sound.”

Are these the actions of a person wanting to reconcile with Vechery? Do any of these actions show any form of remorse? Are these the actions of a person who cares about SEC filing schedules or the shareholders? No. These are the actions of a man attempting to extract payment from Vechery, through any means available to him, including extortion, blackmail, intimidation, and threats of lawsuits. These are the actions of a man who cares only for himself.

For Halpern minions to be continuously posting about due dates is humorous, especially considering Halpern appears to be undermining Vechery every step of the way. If Greg Halpern truly cared about SEC earnings reports, or anything else related to MAXD and the shareholders, he would stop antagonizing Vechery and start cooperating.

[Coo breeze]

How would you know that ?

[jay14]

Kinda late to the party.... Harvey Vechery
is new leadership....

SEC is destined to suspend this ticker soon
Okay!!!!

[grantastic]

CEO Greg Halpern, as usual, fails to deliver on his obligations.

SEC is destined to suspend this ticker soon.

[Coo breeze]

It's the 8th now

[grantastic]

ya so much for vechery taking over

[J Galt]

“MAXD Earnings Date Jul 05, 2023 - Jul 07, 2023....”

Greg Halpern hasn’t filed the required reports in three quarters. The 8-k he filed is a laughable dime store novel. According to his posted comments, Halpern was planning to file another extension on May 19th. Halpern is the same man who intentionally took MAXD from the OTC to the expert market, more than likely to delay the forensic accounting he knew was coming.

There are no earnings to report. There is no ongoing business. All of this is due to Greg Halpern’s mismanagement. And the man who is chronologically challenged has the nerve to post a due date for an “earnings report?” This is nothing more than deflection from Halpern to take the focus away from his past track record and his current claims that he is having business conversations with Harvey Vechery.

[jay14]

MAXD Earnings Date Jul 05, 2023 - Jul 07, 2023....

[MD1941]

I'm not hiding like the ex-CEO of MAXD.

I agree that lady justice is slow. Will lady justice stop the bleeding at nineteen years?

[jay14]

Is that East or West Normandy, nevermind....


Lady Justice is slow going,
but productive in the end....

[J Galt]

“Those post's were from Constance Nash, who seems to know the poster quite well.” Connie Nash thinks she knows the former TA quite well, but if she did, she would have never tangled with him in the first place.

Connie Nash came to the former TA and friend for financial help because Greg Halpern had not made the contracted payments and she needed money. If Halpern had made the payments, she would not have needed help. In other words, it started with Halpern’s lack of ethics by inserting a poison pill into the contract. There’s a word for that, I think it’s called “hoodwinking.”

The bench warrant and judgment indicate they went to court over their disagreement. They won and Nash lost. As is the case with Greg Halpern, Nash chose to battle it out on the boards instead of in court. That’s not how it works. The former TA has repeatedly attempted to work things out with Nash to no avail. She is not interested in settling so they continue moving forward with a bench warrant and judgment.

[MD1941]

The sad tale is about an ex-CEO that looted MAXD for fourteen years.

[MD1941]

Team Halpern's facts are just like the facts from Nash. Who can believe a guy that predicted $100 million dollars in revenue and came up with zero?

[jay14]

No, it's plain to see that there's an agenda here of bitterness....

A sad tale about an ex,
censored transfer agent,

and all the corruption
surrounding the events

that had happened yesteryear....

I posted those remarks from CN,

not Greg Halpern!!!!

JGalt For Halpern to be mentioning current posts by Connie Nash


Those post's were from Constance Nash,
who seems to know the poster quite well,

along with the Former CEO
and
a few other people....


Truth about the real agenda from
a non legitimate MAXD shareholder,
IS simple!!!!

Let's Rehash old outdated information,
mixed with current events,
because it's a civic duty to bring awareness back....lol


Assuming that the Former CEO is posting is laughable....

Maybe posting Constance Nash remarks

should be my civic duty as well....

I'm more interested in Globex
and
the two person company, according to the filings....

Perhaps Constance Nash can enlighten the board....