InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 273
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/14/2012

Re: None

Tuesday, 07/11/2023 1:37:22 PM

Tuesday, July 11, 2023 1:37:22 PM

Post# of 39829
“I TOOK AN EXCLUSIVE LICENSE AND THE RIGHT TO SELL IT IN EARLY 2023 IN EXCHANGE FOR SOME OF THE SEVEN FIGURES THE COMPANY OWED ME BEFORE VECHERY GOT THE COURT.”

All MAXD assets were committed to Harvey Vechery by notes and Halpern had no right to even claim the asset, much less propose to sell it. This is just another Halpern fraud. Granting a “license to self” based on false dollars he claimed were owed to him by the company. What about notes due to Harvey Vechery from both MAXD and Greg Halpern personally? Wouldn’t that have cancelled out any supposed notes due from MAXD to Halpern?

The board of directors didn’t approve this deal because there was no board of directors. There has been no board oversight since John Blaisure was terminated. Which, by the way, was over the false valuation, interest, and accrual process Halpern was using in the filings. Blaisure demanded Halpern address that process and refused to sign the SEC filings until it was changed. Instead, Halpern terminated Blaisure as CEO, appointed himself as the new CEO, signed and submitted the SEC forms, and then continued piling on the interest.

John Blaisure’s concern prior to his termination has now become a reality. Blaisure was confident, based on years of experience working with Halpern, that Greg was going to use that artificial debt he was accruing sometime in the future to defraud the shareholders. That’s why he demanded that Halpern stop accruing interest and adjust the filings. Greg refused, Blaisure was terminated, and here we are. What is Halpern now attempting? He is claiming he gave himself the rights to patented technology so he can spin it into a new company and commence enticing investors to pony up for the ride.

This is the “golden parachute” Halpern has awarded himself on the way out the MAXD door. The problem with that thought process is that it’s not legal. All the MAXD patents, trademarks, and technology has been pledged to Harvey Vechery in exchange for notes. All the assets of the company are owned by Harvey Vechery.

Let’s examine the words of the Honorable Judge Timothy Taylor in relation to what Greg Halpern has just claimed. “Halpern has engaged in conduct in his capacity as a director of defendant Max Sound constituting fraudulent or dishonest acts or gross abuse of authority or discretion with reference to the corporation.” And this further statement, “Halpern’s Misrepresentations Regarding the Business of Max Sound.” And finally, this is the key reference in regard to Halpern’s comments yesterday on the Hoodwinkers and HV sites, “Halpern Does Not Adhere to Corporate Formalities and Operates Max Sound in Order to Loot Max Sound and its Shareholders.” That is exactly what Halpern is doing by claiming he has granted himself the rights to the technology, LOOTING THE SHAREHOLDERS! Technology that belongs to Harvey Vechery and the shareholders, not Greg Halpern. Furthermore, no legitimate company will ever do business with Greg Halpern, MAXD Audio Biometric patent thievery or not, because his track record is now well known and documented in court cases. All it takes is a simple Google search to realize the long trail of financial tears Halpern has left in his wake.

One final point, granting a license is a material event. If this transaction was completed “in early 2023…before Vechery got the court,” as Halpern stated, then where was the required SEC 8-K for a material event? Halpern was in charge and responsible for all filings up until the court removed him on May 18th retroactive to April 28th. The judgment was issued on January 11th. When did this supposed transaction take place? Before January 11th? Before April 28th? Before May 18th? Again, where was the 8-K for this material event? I think we can all read the tea leaves here and see the obvious. This was a retroactive transaction, illegally transferring assets to Halpern, via an arm’s length self-serving transaction, which is not only illegal, but involving technology already owned by Vechery through defaulted notes.

To summarize, Greg Halpern has retroactively granted himself, after a judgment and Final Order was granted to Harvey Vechery, the exclusive rights to license and sell an asset owned by the company and committed to Vechery as collateral on notes from Vechery to MAXD and Halpern personally. Again, interplanetary Pleiadean law will not be upheld by the US court system and Halpern will have to forfeit this self-serving deal. Halpern’s days of looting the shareholders of MAXD are over.