InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 273
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/14/2012

Re: None

Wednesday, 07/05/2023 9:56:04 AM

Wednesday, July 05, 2023 9:56:04 AM

Post# of 39829
“Those post's were from Constance Nash, who seems to know the poster quite well.” Connie Nash thinks she knows the former TA quite well, but if she did, she would have never tangled with him in the first place.

Connie Nash came to the former TA and friend for financial help because Greg Halpern had not made the contracted payments and she needed money. If Halpern had made the payments, she would not have needed help. In other words, it started with Halpern’s lack of ethics by inserting a poison pill into the contract. There’s a word for that, I think it’s called “hoodwinking.”

The bench warrant and judgment indicate they went to court over their disagreement. They won and Nash lost. As is the case with Greg Halpern, Nash chose to battle it out on the boards instead of in court. That’s not how it works. The former TA has repeatedly attempted to work things out with Nash to no avail. She is not interested in settling so they continue moving forward with a bench warrant and judgment.