GUNS/BARMS (GUNS)

[Gmenfan]

[Vexari]

Sunday shoot - a - round

With my S&W 632 Ultimate Carry chambered in .32 H&R Magnum

As well as a Mossberg 940 Pro Tactical

Another beautiful day in TN

[Vexari]

What are they afraid of

2nd amendment

Or the people

[Gmenfan]

Gun Rights Under Attack in New York State – Again

One of three new bills appears to be an attempt to intimidate gun owners.

by Graham J Noble | Apr 8, 2025


New York Governor Kathy Hochul (D) announced on April 3 that she had signed three new gun-control bills into law and would be setting aside another $370 million to tackle gun violence across the Empire State. All three of the new bills present challenges to gun rights enshrined in the Second Amendment; and one piece of legislation raises personal privacy concerns and likely infringes upon Americans’ Fourth Amendment right to be secure against “unreasonable searches and seizures.”

Bill S.744/A.436 imposes penalties for installing a small device into a semiautomatic pistol that enables it to simulate fully automatic fire. Commonly known as a “Glock switch,” this device is already illegal at the federal level and has been for some time. The second measure, Bill S.743/A.437, places an additional burden upon gun dealers to provide potential customers with materials warning against the risks and dangers associated with firearms. Think of it as the Surgeon General’s warning label on a packet of cigarettes. But it is the third of this trio that is drawing the ire of gun rights advocates.

Exercise Your Gun Rights, Lose Your Privacy?

Bill S.745/A.439 introduces a merchant code that will make it easier for law enforcement agencies to track firearms and ammunition purchases made via credit card. The first concern, here, is that a whole new layer of public employees will now have at least limited access to private citizens’ credit card information.

More troubling even than that is Hochul’s attempt to justify the Big Brother move against gun rights. “This gives law enforcement the opportunity to find out exactly who may be stockpiling ammunition,” she said. “And this is an indicator that something untoward could be happening, so it’s an important data point for us to have.”

There’s a lot to unpack from this curious reasoning. The first and most obvious point is that there is no federal law – nor, to this author’s knowledge, is there a law in any of the 50 states – against stockpiling ammunition. The New York state government, then, has branded people potentially dangerous or potentially criminal for doing something that is not at all illegal.

There’s also the question of how one defines “stockpiling.” What is the threshold at which the purchase of a large quantity of ammunition or frequent smaller ammo purchases becomes stockpiling? And who gets to decide? The average gun-grabbing politician or activist would likely consider 500 rounds of ammunition a stockpile, while the gun rights advocate would laugh at such an assumption. The dedicated firearms enthusiast or the competitive shooter would tell you that 500 rounds is equal to next month’s range-days ammo. The serious prepper might tell you that you don’t have a stockpile until you’ve got at least maybe 20,000 rounds – that you are not even using for training; that’s ammo kept in reserve for when the excrement hits the fan.

Intimidation Tactics

How would anyone determine if an individual is stockpiling ammunition? The guy who wants to build a large cache of ammo, but who is operating on a modest budget, may be buying just 40 or 60 rounds at a time – and only perhaps once every couple of months. At the same time, the person buying 500 rounds a month may just be doing a lot of range training. Without physical searches, no law enforcement officer would reasonably be able to determine whether someone is stockpiling ammo.



And, again, there is no law against it, and it could be for legitimate reasons, such as family safety and protection, should there be some catastrophic event.

Hochul’s comments are either deceptive or nonsensical. A strong possibility exists that this is an intimidation tactic. Just one more weapon in the war on gun rights. You’ve been warned: If we notice you are buying what we consider to be excessively large quantities of ammunition, we will flag you as a potential threat.

It is probably only a matter of time before one or all of these bills become the centerpieces of lawsuits filed by gun rights groups. The state of New York hasn’t fared particularly well in legal tussles with gun rights advocates. Still, the main takeaway from these new laws is that politicians like Hochul will never give up trying to find ways to deny law-abiding Americans their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms without infringement.

https://www.libertynation.com/gun-rights-under-attack-again-in-new-york-what-theyre-up-to-now/

[logman]

Hello just thought I would stop by and see who's still on the board.
It been a while for me.

[Vexari]

Challenging conventional wisdom

~~~ Changing perspective ~~~

Between guns and crime

John R. Lott Jr.'s "More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws (Third Edition)" challenges conventional views by presenting extensive data showing that right-to-carry (RTC) laws—which allow concealed handguns—are linked to reduced violent crime. Since the 1990s, the number of states with RTC laws has grown from 18 to 42, enabling Lott to expand his analysis from 1977 to 2005 across 40 states. His findings confirm that RTC laws correlate with significant drops in murders (8%), rapes (5%), and aggravated assaults (7%), while also deterring multiple-victim shootings. The book addresses criticisms, such as claims of methodological flaws or bias, by emphasizing robust, peer-reviewed data and countering arguments about crime displacement or increased domestic violence. Lott also examines newer policies like the Castle Doctrine and the federal assault weapons ban, finding no evidence that RTC laws increase suicides or accidents. He argues that concealed carry is a cost-effective crime deterrent, saving billions annually, and asserts that more guns can lead to less crime—a conclusion supported by his expansive research but still hotly debated. Despite political opposition, Lott maintains that the data speaks for itself.

For more videos, visit BrightLearn.ai

Find a copy of this amazing book here: https://www.amazon.com/More-Guns-Less-Crime-Understanding/dp/0226493660

[Vexari]

Milk cartons disintegrate

When hit on the range

With a large caliber

What if milk cartons showing "missing" kids

Were advertisements open for bid

To pedophiles, adrenochrome

Or whatever's in between

Different perspective

[Gmenfan]

Mass shootings: we're all survivors!

By Mike McDaniel

Remember the “missing children” craze of decades past? Photos of moppets appeared on milk cartons, and the numbers of supposedly “missing” kids were so high cooler heads eventually began asking questions and it was quickly discovered the numbers “activists” were pushing were nonsensical, their methods and data political rather than replicable. Perhaps the activists had good intentions, perhaps not, but as Americans realized they were being hoaxed, the milk carton photos disappeared.

We’re well into the process of discovering just how badly we’ve been hoaxed by gun control cracktivists. The latest comes from Gabriel Gifford’s anti-liberty/gun group which is lauding “research” purporting to show one in 15 Americans have “survived” a mass shooting. In other words, some 7% of the population, nearly 24 million people, have been directly involved in a mass shooting, loosely defined as an incident in which four or more people were shot.



These figures were derived from a survey of 10,000 people, a survey, not independent, verifiable, research that sampled data from multiple, reliable sources, but a survey of only 0.00293% of the population. This is the expansive definition used in the survey:

Being present at the scene of a mass shooting or sustaining a physical injury from the event, whether by being shot, trampled, or experiencing another injury during the incident.

It’s worse than even that definition might suggest:

The survey gave the Surveyed wide-ranging choices to choose from when deciding if they qualified as being “present on the scene,” from actually being shot to simply being able to “hear the gunfire.”

At the Parkland attack, the killer was present in only one three-story building on a widely spread campus of 13 separate buildings. Given the survey definition, respondents at Parkland could claim “survivor” status even if they weren’t in that building. Just being on the Parkland campus would qualify. And at Parkland, many in that building were in no danger, nor were they aware of the killer. From the first to the last shot less than six minutes elapsed.

The study locations included shopping outlets and concerts or outdoor events which also may be very misleading because the vast majority of people in these locations during the time of an incident although able to “hear” a gunshot may not have been near the actual site. In a concert situation you could have anywhere from 20,000 to 50,000 or more people in attendance while only a small number of people may be affected by a so-called mass shooting, but under the criteria of the study could claim to have had ‘direct exposure.”

The study also apparently ignores the human tendency to want to be a part of some notorious event in even the most tangential way. Oh yeah, I was there. One would reasonably believe to be a “survivor” of a mass shooting one would need to have been in actual physical danger or even injured and recovered from their wounds. Mere proximity to an attack when one was never in danger wouldn’t qualify. It’s rather like being within 20 miles of a tornado, suffering no injury or property damage, yet claiming “survivor” status.

Locations where the study by David C Pyrooz claims 7% of the U.S. population were present on the scene of a shooting included the following:

*12.38% bars and restaurants

*12.09% schools

*11.51% shopping outlets

*11.05% concerts or outdoor events.

*34.69% of locations were vaguely listed as “a neighborhood.”

Even in a bar or restaurant, many patrons would likely have never been in danger, and the survey apparently does not differentiate between gang shootings or arguments among people who know each other that devolved into gunfire. Such events are very different from a stranger walking into a place intent on killing as many innocent strangers as possible. The rest of the places Pyrooz cited are large enough to ensure most people present were never in actual danger, and likely weren’t aware anything was happening, though in hindsight, and presented with Pyrooz’s expansive definition, could think themselves a “survivor.” And what is a “neighborhood?” What are its geographic boundaries? A block? A mile? How many people could possibly have been in direct danger? We have no idea.

Giffords reveals her real, fear-inspiring, goal with this:

In what appears to be an attempt at further perpetuating the irrational fear of guns, Pyrooz said when referring to “mass shootings,” “it’s not a question of if one will occur in your community anymore, but when.”

Fortunately, actual mass shootings remain rare. Dr. John R. Lott has proved with replicable research, between 1950 and 2019, 94% of actual mass shootings occurred in gun free zones, useful information that suggests, as Pyrooz’s does not, two functional solutions: (1) eliminate gun free zones, and (2) more widespread armament of the law-abiding.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/03/mass_shootings_we_re_all_survivors.html

[Trinityz1]

NICE
good article just before that, 1st I'd seen of that

[Gmenfan]

For gun enthusiasts:

[Gmenfan]

DOJ creating path for people with criminal convictions to again own guns

This provision already exists by no money is allocated to it.

The Justice Department (DOJ) plans to create a process for those with criminal convictions to restore their gun rights, sparking alarm it will return firearms to those convicted of violent crimes.

The interim rule, posted in the Federal Register Thursday, follows a February executive order from President Trump directing a review of the country’s gun restrictions to “assess any ongoing infringements.”

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF) has the power to restore gun rights, but the agency has been blocked from doing so under congressional appropriations riders since 1992. Under the DOJ proposal, the attorney general would designate that power within the department.

DOJ said the rule “reflects an appropriate avenue to restore firearm rights to certain individuals who no longer warrant such disability based on a combination of the nature of their past criminal activity and their subsequent and current law-abiding behavior.”

The notice also said that “no constitutional right is limitless” and that they would be “screening out others for whom full restoration of firearm rights would not be appropriate.”

However, groups advocating against gun violence argue the policy would ease the process for those convicted of violent crimes to gain access to a weapon.

“The Trump Administration is throwing out decades of bipartisan precedent and laying the groundwork to put guns back in the hands of domestic abusers and violent criminals,” John Feinblatt, president of Everytown for Gun Safety, said in a statement.

“At a time when violent crime is down, this dangerous development could put law enforcement and our communities at greater risk by opening the floodgates to violent criminals rearming themselves,” he added.

The Justice Department recently moved to restore gun rights to Mel Gibson, who lost his gun rights in connection with a 2011 conviction on misdemeanor domestic violence charges.

One Justice Department attorney was fired after she refused to recommend restoration of his gun rights, with former pardon attorney Liz Oyer saying she felt she could not do so given the risks associated with returning guns to those convicted of violent crimes.

The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence said the rule would create “a unilateral system to give gun rights back to those who are dangerous and high risk.”

“This is a blatant and dangerous power grab by the Trump Administration and a gift to his donors in the gun industry – one that will open new markets for them by putting guns back into the hands of people who should never have them. In no uncertain terms, Trump is paving the way for mass restoration of gun rights without guardrails,” Kris Brown, the president of the group said in a statement.

Gun rights groups celebrated the interim rule, with Gun Owners of America saying it would end the “legal limbo” for those seeking to restore their right to own a weapon.

“For decades, law-abiding Americans who have had their gun rights unfairly restricted have been left in legal limbo — creating an unconstitutional de facto lifetime gun ban,” Erich Pratt, the group’s senior vice president, said in a statement.

“This bureaucratic failure has denied thousands of individuals their lawful opportunity to restore their rights,” he added

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5205204-justice-department-gun-rights-criminal-convictions/

[Gmenfan]

Pistolas at SCOTUS: Mexico v. Smith and Wesson for $10 Billion

One justice's anti-Second Amendment bias was on full display.

by Scott D. Cosenza, Esq. | Mar 5, 2025


The Supreme Court heard arguments in Smith & Wesson v. Mexico on Tuesday, March 4. The case appears designed to bankrupt the American firearms manufacturing industry while enriching our southern neighbors and it aligns Mexico with US-based anti-gunners. While court watchers expected to see pushback from conservatarian justices like Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch on such claims, other members of the court also seemed to disfavor the arguments, including Biden appointee Ketanji Brown Jackson. It looks like the eventual ruling will amount to another loss for gun prohibitionists and a win for individual rights.

A popular tactic favored by gun grabbers is to sue gun makers out of existence. The plaintiff’s bar, let loose, would move juries to tears with the experience of gun violence survivors. Then, they demand the gun companies open up their checkbooks and pay damages. Congress ended the practice in 2005 with the passage of the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA). As the Wall St. Journal reported at the time, “Gun controllers have responded [to legislative defeats] by avoiding legislatures and going to court, teaming with trial lawyers and big city mayors to file lawsuits blaming gun makers for murder.”

Mexico and the Anti-Gunners

That did the trick, mostly, until 2021. That’s when a group of highly motivated anti-gun movement lawyers thought they could poke a hole through the liability shield – via a ten-billion-dollar damage claim. The lawyers are those at the top of Big Anti-Gun – very talented career hoplophobes (people who suffer from an irrational fear of firearms) who have spent their lives trying to disarm their fellow Americans. How? By asserting that gun manufacturers should have known that some of their products would be used to commit crimes and are, therefore, liable.



The district court dismissed the claim as barred by the PLCAA. But then Mexico got a big break from the First Circuit Court of Appeals, which accepted the plaintiff’s theory that, as the defense brief put it, “defendants make firearms available knowing that some will be unlawfully smuggled abroad and put to criminal use and that they could be doing more to stop the problem.” No evidence was provided to back up the claim – no matter that gun manufacturers sell to federally licensed firearm distributors, which sell to federally licensed firearm dealers. It’s akin to a victim of a drunk driver suing Budweiser because they knew some people would drink and drive.

The Wise Latina Strikes Again

Most of the justices’ interactions with the advocates were sufficiently critical to lead many to predict Mexico would lose its case. Justice Sotomayor was a notable exception to an otherwise mostly skeptical reception. She invented the notion that producing flashy-looking weapons was designed to appeal to cartel members. Then, our most progressive justice mistakenly equated correlation with causation:

“You have the manufacturers aiding and abetting, in your theory, by producing guns that are singularly attractive to the cartel because they are designed in a particular way that cartel members like because they’re showy. They’re making erasable serial numbers, which obviously are attractive to criminals because every criminal would like to erase the serial number if they can.”

New banner Legal Affairs with ScottThe guns with erasable serial numbers appear to be fabricated by her imagination. Even still, Sotomayor doesn’t seem to understand how criminals operate. Almost no criminal keeps or carries a firearm without a serial number because mere possession of it is an additional federal crime. And one that’s easy to prove! While proving a drug conspiracy or fraud operation may be quite challenging for police and prosecutors, the same is not true if they encounter anyone with a firearm having an obliterated serial number. 18 U.S.C.§ 922(k) makes mere possession of such a gun a felony punishable by a 5-year term.

Mexico has ultra-strict gun control laws. Only two gun stores serve the needs of its 131 million people. By comparison, Wyoming has 566 licensed gun dealers. Wyoming’s homicide rate is 2.6 per 100,000 people. In Mexico, it’s 23.3. This appeal springs from a pre-trial motion to dismiss the case. Smith and Wesson could lose this appeal and later win their case in a lower court or upon further appeal. The Supreme Court is expected to issue a ruling by summer.

https://www.libertynation.com/pistolas-at-scotus-mexico-v-smith-and-wesson-for-10-billion/

[Gmenfan]

The Babylon Bee Guide To The Best Gun For Every Situation



While everyone can agree that guns are awesome (and if you don't think so, you're probably gay), it can be difficult to determine which gun is right for any given scenario.

The manly gun experts at the Babylon Bee are here to help you know exactly which gun you need for each job:

General home defense: M1 Garand. Enjoy the sweet sounds of storming Omaha Beach right in your living room.

Deer hunting: Bazooka.

Attracting the ladies: Guns don't work here; you'll need an oversized anime sword.

Political debates: A Marin le Bourgeoys flintlock pistol. Should be accurate up to 10 paces.

Scaring away daughter's suitors: Trusty Remington 870 12-gauge. Simply rack the pump-action and watch those pencil-neck dweebs scurry away.

Dealing with bounty hunters sent by Jabba the Hutt to collect a price on your head: BlasTech DL-44. It works best if you're the one who shoots first.

Seeing your bros from across the room: Finger guns.

Fighting off fanatical alien zealots who are trying to trigger a superweapon that will destroy all sentient life in the galaxy: Trusty MA5B assault rifle and a coupla sticky grenades.

Driving cattle through yonder pass before the Comanches arrive: A classic lever-action rifle.

Looking like a tool at the range: A tactical lever-action rifle.

5th-grade sleepover: Nerf Elite Titan CS-50. Revel in the mournful cries of your enemies as they fall in a hail of foam bullets.

Road rage: Glock 19. Must be held sideways.

Fending off a mob of commie ANTIFA soy boys: No gun needed, just misgender them.

Simply follow the guidelines listed above to find the ideal weapon for each task. What other guns are perfectly suited for specific uses? Post them in the comments below.

https://babylonbee.com/news/the-babylon-bee-guide-to-the-best-gun-for-every-situation

[Gmenfan]

Suppressors:

The Second Amendment: new Trumpian opportunities

By Mike McDaniel


As with the efforts of DOGE in exposing outlandishly costly fraud, graft and funding for American’s domestic and foreign enemies, Democrats/socialists/communists are screaming in anguish and rage at the thought of Americans once again having accountability over unaccountable bureaucrats and politicians and regaining stolen liberty.



As Barack Obama sneered, elections have consequences. Among them, with Donald Trump’s reelection, is a new respect for the Second Amendment, the part of the Bill of Rights that secures the rest. For the first time in many years, there is real potential to pass laws that would enhance individual liberty.

Sen Mike Lee has proposed the SHUSH Act to deregulate suppressors (there’s no such thing as a silencer). The provisions:


*Eliminate federal regulation of suppressors as firearms under the National Firearms Act (NFA) and the Gun Control Act (GCA).

*Remove existing taxes, fees, and registration requirements associated with suppressors.

*Allow current or retired law enforcement officers to carry concealed firearms with suppressors.

*Preempt state regulations on the manufacture, transfer, transport, or possession of suppressors.

*Strike provisions requiring mandatory minimum sentences for suppressor possession in certain cases.

*Exempt suppressors from regulation by the Consumer Product Safety Commission.

*Provide a provision for a refund of the $200 transfer tax for anyone who purchased a suppressor within two years prior to the enactment of the bill.

*If passed, the SHUSH Act will work alongside the Hearing Protection Act to further deregulate suppressors and remove them from the Gun Control Act of 1968.

In essence, suppressors would no longer be treated like machineguns, requiring a lengthy and expensive federal process. They’d be treated like other lawful firearm accessories.

And Rep. Richard Hudson has introduced the Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act, which would require states to treat concealed carry permits essentially as driver’s licenses.

Both more than reasonable laws have never been up for a vote in the past, even when Republicans held the House, Senate and White House, because Republican “leaders” said the time wasn’t right. Perhaps it finally is. Free Americans may never get a better chance to claw back essential liberty and foil blue, anti-liberty/gun states.

Perhaps most encouraging is President Trump’s Second Amendment Executive Order, which strongly suggests he’d sign the aforementioned bills and other legislation that would preserve and strengthen individual liberty. His EO requires (in part):

Sec. 2. Plan of Action. (a) Within 30 days of the date of this order, the Attorney General shall examine all orders, regulations, guidance, plans, international agreements, and other actions of executive departments and agencies (agencies) to assess any ongoing infringements of the Second Amendment rights of our citizens, and present a proposed plan of action to the President, through the Domestic Policy Advisor, to protect the Second Amendment rights of all Americans.
(b) In developing such proposed plan of action, the Attorney General shall review, at a minimum:
(i) All Presidential and agencies’ actions from January 2021 through January 2025 that purport to promote safety but may have impinged on the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens;
(ii) Rules promulgated by the Department of Justice, including by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, from January 2021 through January 2025 pertaining to firearms and/or Federal firearms licensees;
(iii) Agencies’ plans, orders, and actions regarding the so-called “enhanced regulatory enforcement policy” pertaining to firearms and/or Federal firearms licensees;
(iv) Reports and related documents issued by the White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention;
(v) The positions taken by the United States in any and all ongoing and potential litigation that affects or could affect the ability of Americans to exercise their Second Amendment rights;
(vi) Agencies’ classifications of firearms and ammunition; and
(vii) The processing of applications to make, manufacture, transfer, or export firearms.

Sec. 3. Implementation. Upon submission of the proposed plan of action described in section 2 of this order, the Attorney General shall work with the Domestic Policy Advisor to finalize the plan of action and establish a process for implementation.

In other words, in short order the Trump Administration will eliminate gun control bureaucrats and programs hidden in the government, end any on-going anti-Second Amendment litigation, end unconscionable government harassment of law-abiding Federal Firearm License dealers and even end the ATF’s prior unjustified reclassification of guns and accessories that made instant felons of millions of law-abiding Americans for possessing previously lawful things.

And that wasn’t the only necessary and worthwhile step Trump has taken in support of the Second Amendment. Within little more than a day after taking office, Trump shuttered the White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention, a thinly veiled anti-liberty/gun bureaucracy--as if the ATF wasn’t enough-- started by the Harris/Biden Administration that would have done nothing to prevent violence but much to steal additional liberty.

As with the efforts of DOGE in exposing outlandishly costly fraud, graft and funding for American’s domestic and foreign enemies, Democrats/socialists/communists are screaming in anguish and rage at the thought of Americans once again having accountability over unaccountable bureaucrats and politicians and regaining stolen liberty.

That’s discordant music to the ears of free Americans, and it’s long past time.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/02/the_second_amendment_new_trumpian_opportunities.html

[Vexari]

Spinning like a high-speed blender of pure power

2000 to 6000 rounds per minute

The M134

Not just a gun

It's an experience

[Vexari]

Wrist curls needed with that caliber

Strong wrists

Better shot

[Gmenfan]

Certainly stop a home invader.

[Vexari]

This should stop

A Grizzly

[Vexari]

Dependable and easy to maintain

[Trinityz1]

Benelli's are good

[Vexari]

With a Benelli M4 tactical

A reliable gas system

How it works

[Gmenfan]

Gun grabbers take note.

[Vexari]

Unique pistol with a punch

Taurus Judge Home Defender

[Vexari]

Are steel toed boots bullet proof

In case one shoots oneself

In the foot

[Vexari]

This makes sense

~~~ Not a leg to stand on ~~~
(2:19)

Commit it to long term memory

By understanding how it stifles

Don't Tread On Me

[Vexari]

Enough is enough

~~~ When all that is trusted ~~~
(16:24)

Turns its back

Death_Angel

[Trinityz1]

Trump spoke about this before and the TDS nutbars etc didn't believe it

oh yeah, she said it- but says she's changed her mind now

doesn't matter----she just lies...says whatever they think people want to hear
chicken in every pot ec

[Gmenfan]

HOLY SMOKES. Unearthed footage shows San Francisco DA Kamala Harris vowing to FORCIBLY ENTER HOMES to check how private gun owners are storing their firearms.

This video just sealed Trump’s victory.

We’ve never had a nominee this extreme.
pic.twitter.com/91wbAIgNnN

— johnny maga (@_johnnymaga) September 18, 2024

[Vexari]

Reality of war

Non scripted version

[Trinityz1]

good grief

[getmoreshares]

LOL

This story of a woman being charged with assault with a weapon over a water gun makes a mockery of our justice system.

pic.twitter.com/Guhhzc0wYm

— Brian Lilley (@brianlilley) September 12, 2024

[PMS Witch]

In Canada, a 58 year old woman was charged after shooting man using a water gun.

Link to Story

Cheers, PW.

[Vexari]

District of Columbia v. Heller

554 US 570, 582 (2008)

Justice Scalia

~~~ What does this mean ~~~
(16:43)

Jim Crenshaw

[Vexari]

The second amendment

Is this countries

Immune system

[Vexari]

A tactical perspective of a shooting

~~~ Where was the secret service ~~~
(51:59)

Has all the hallmarks of an inside job

To learn more, visit: https://jeffreyprather.com/

For more updates, visit: http://www.brighteon.com/channel/hrreport

NaturalNews

[Vexari]

Am sure it will slow it down some

Would be nice

To see how well it does

[Gmenfan]

Too bad they didn't test it for bullet penetration!

[Gmenfan]

Maybe happening soon in your neck of the woods?

‘Merica: Grocery Stores Selling Ammunition Out of Vending Machines in Alabama and Oklahoma
AWR HAWKINS 6 Jul 2024 2:11

Some grocery stores in Alabama and Oklahoma now have American Rounds vending machines which allow customers to buy ammo for their guns while getting a cart full of groceries for their families.

Cleveland.com reported on the vending machines, noting they are currently in six locations and “[use] artificial intelligence technology to verify a buyer’s identification and age through card scanning and facial recognition software.”

One of the locations is a Fresh Value store in Tuscaloosa, Alabama.

Terry Stanley, COO of the Fresh Value, said, “We’re always looking for ways to give our customers another reason to come visit our stores. Anything we can do to help them make their shopping trips easier, based on the feedback we’ve gotten from customers today, they are so excited about us having this ammo kiosk.”

American Rounds, the company which manufactures and distributes the ammo vending machines, has a statement on its website explaining that their system of purchase age and eligibility checks “ensures that all transactions comply with federal and local regulations, maintaining the highest standards of responsible sales.”

Additionally, American Rounds pointed out, “We are committed to providing a secure environment that customers can trust for their ammunition needs.”

https://www.breitbart.com/2nd-amendment/2024/07/06/merica-grocery-stores-selling-ammunition-out-of-vending-machines-in-alabama-and-oklahoma/

[excel]

Yes ............

[Trinityz1]

LOL! good one

[excel]

Love this one ......................

[Vexari]

Innovation at its finest

~~~ Bullet proof paint? ~~~
(5:55)

Eye of the tiger mentality

Jim Crenshaw

[Vexari]

Shotguns as a drone countermeasure

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=twRPibUO5JA (15:24)


This is what it can do

~~~ In the field ~~~
(0:33)

With a turkey load

InrangeTV

[excel]

Here you go ...............

[Vexari]

Try that in a small town

For those

That have no clue

[Vexari]

Before all else

Be armed

~ Niccolo Machiavelli ~

[Vexari]

Summation of the Bennelli M4

[Vexari]

Talking through one's instrument

Is what it's all about

Once it's

Explained

[Vexari]

Lynyrd Skynyrd - Freebird - 7/2/1977

Oakland Coliseum

[Trinityz1]

LOL!