Why would you accept the poster's assertions of Fifer's charitable inclinations at face value? The only existing evidence of charity is the poster's continuing insistence that Fifer 'donates more to charity than he receives in salary,' and I think by now we all know the essential value of that poster's assertions.
This time I particularly enjoyed the 'We all know.' That was a nice touch I thought.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
