Why would you accept the poster's assertions of Fifer's charitable inclinations at face value? The only existing evidence of charity is the poster's continuing insistence that Fifer 'donates more to charity than he receives in salary,' and I think by now we all know the essential value of that poster's assertions.
This time I particularly enjoyed the 'We all know.' That was a nice touch I thought.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.