Sophist, it appears your post is nothing more than an attempt to sow doubt in the eyes of those who will be voting on the additional options. You claim there are simply "too many unknowns regarding the purpose, implementation and all effects" of this proposal to know whether it will be good or bad for shareholders. LOL!
It was managements job to make the case that more options would be a good thing. They failed to do so. Why should we give more options to a group who can't even tell us why we should? It's not shareholders job to blindly approve managements requests, why bother to vote if that's all we're doing?
Furthermore, I am very suspect of anyone who is lobbying on behalf of corporate insiders.
Once
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
