InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

bim524

11/18/13 12:15 PM

#377636 RE: postyle #377635

this was discussed before, but NOK pee'ed on itself when it didn't try to fight FRAND during the trial(prob thought it was a losing effort considering the offers IDCC prob made), nor did they appeal it.

then they see this FRAND thing blow up recently with the white house and SAM/APPLE and want to say… oops, I forgot and want to redo.



too bad beech.
icon url

the trading doctor

11/18/13 12:33 PM

#377640 RE: postyle #377635


Postyle

Thanks so much for posting the PDF version.

While I realize that my opinion on it is subjected as I have been a long suffering LONG, reading it as objectively as possible, how can idcc lose? To win at every level regarding domestic industry one of such levels was the supreme court.

Certainly I would expect our letter to be written in a manner that makes our case a slam dunk, but as I said, looking at each objectively nokia has been grasping for straws and they appear to be backed against the wall.

that being said, they are a big company that has been able to use the legal system to their benefit in hopes that idcc would give up, settle for pennies on the dollar or maybe if they were lucky enough goes out of business.

Being a long time sufferer of this stock and considering the price action since the blow out quarters there is something in me that thinks something negative is going to drop. I have no proof whatsoever other then the price action that should have had the price going back up into the high 30's if not 40 and here we are testing new lows.

I hope I am wrong and if I knew nothing other then reading this letter I would be resting easily, but that is not the case. I just don't believe nokia has ever been up against the wall and out of options. they always seem to pull another Houdini act.

just my wonderings on a sunny day here in PA.