"they may have been negligent and a factor in LQMT not securing business."
Sure, let's see what we have here. Visser who has a long track record of successfully securing profitable business and LQMT who has a long track record of not securing any significantly profitable business that will sustain their existence without diluting shareholders to pay bills. Of which Visser is one.
Visser who invested millions in LQMT with the hopes of securing business and profiting from his investment. LQMT who has a long track record of taking millions of dollars of other people's investments and turning them into nothing but fleeting hope for tomorrow, or next quarter or next year or a decade later.........
Seems legit, but, nevertheless, merely my opinion. Good luck.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
