InvestorsHub Logo

ZombieSecurityAgent

10/13/13 2:42 PM

#38039 RE: HIKER_II #38034

That was a very good video even though that event was staged to attract investors.

The key here is EXECUTION and whether or not an investor has confidence in Steipps ability to reach that projected 1 to 2 year outlook of getting contracts. As well as, how much shareholders will be diluted during this period.

Having Apple and Swatch as licensees should be more than priced in at this point. I am sure when Steipp sees a potential client he conveys the crediblibility of having these large partnerships, but, at the end of the day, a potential client will choose which material is most efficient to use on many different levels to make its parts.

What happened to the Bentley Key Fob idea? I actually thought that LM would be a perfect material to use for the following reasons.

1. Pocket scuff age. LM scratch resistance is key.

2. Lightweight. No one wants to carry a brick in their pocket.

3. Corrosion resistant and appearance. LM is very attractive in pictures. The only actually piece I have ever seen is the SIM card ejector tool and it has some obvious scratches but, is shiny.

4. Because Bentley can afford to use whatever material they believe would impress and satisfy the customers. Sure they wouldn't sell a zillion of them, but, LQMT could charge premium margins and would further gain luxury credibility, like Swatch.

Gotta start somewhere. Just my opinion. Good luck guys.

Watts Watt

10/13/13 8:29 PM

#38046 RE: HIKER_II #38034

I think it is great to review this interview, which was probably Steipp's best interview to date, even including present time, which is one year later than the date of the interview (Oct 24, 2012).

The facts that I gleaned from Steipp, one year ago, follows:

1) Liquidmetal is not a revenue play. This also agrees with several optimistic posters here that Liquidmetal is a play for "potential" and not "actual)

2) He agreed with the interviewer that it would be 2 to 3 years before any contracts would develop into revenue. This (simple math) means Oct 2014 thru Oct 2015 would be the starting point for revenues. NOTE: Steipp said, "WE BELIEVE" and not that it was certain. He also said, that this is what investors should be looking for - down the road, emergence of a disruptive technology.

3) Steipp, correcting the interviewer, said LQMT did not have just one million and a half in the bank, but that they (Oct 2012) had 8.5 million in the bank and were debt-free. It is now one year later. Steipp further said LQMT will run out of cash at the end of 2013. If correct, Steipp needs to find new funds before Christmas.

(IMO, this certainly points to another round of dilution - not just increasing the authorized as is now in black and white in the prospectus, but, indeed increasing the issue. Note that Steipp uses the term "amortization" rather than "dilution" to describe LQMT's fund raising modus operendi. However, any long term long knows that selling off assets, dilution and borrowing money from Visser, has been the way LQMT has raised funds, without exception.
And again, Steipp said that investors should be smiling about this. Essentially, he said, don't look at what we haven't achieved, but what we are going to achieve. And he further elaborated that investors should only be looking at the number of prototypes)

What I don't understand is how 8.5 million dollars has been spent over the past year, when Materion is absorbing all of the expense of manufacturing ingots; Engel is absorbing all of the expense of doing the R&D for the IM machines, and Apple has been coming up with all of the new patents, some of which have cone to CIP. In other words, someone tell me what LQMT is doing.

Finally, Steipp says that investors should only be concerned with the number of prototypes....Could someone tell me exactly how many prototypes have been produced to date; how many were totally rejected, and how many are still in the running. I mean, prototypes which are commercial production ready.

Remember, Steipp said they were ready to roll, production-wise, one year ago. But the latest PR stated that that was not the case at all. The latest case says that LQMT has only achieved that point within the last few weeks, BUT.........and it is still a big BUTT, that LQMT (most likely, the clients of LQMT) is waiting for Engel to sign off on the testing of the new turn-key machines.

ENGEL has not yet signed off on the TESTING OF THE MACHINES.

Chas42va

10/13/13 9:27 PM

#38049 RE: HIKER_II #38034

Thanks for the good video from CEO Steep.

He mentions two or 3 quarters which would be about now. For some additional revenues