InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 62
Posts 4507
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/09/2012

Re: HIKER_II post# 38034

Sunday, 10/13/2013 2:42:18 PM

Sunday, October 13, 2013 2:42:18 PM

Post# of 232823
That was a very good video even though that event was staged to attract investors.

The key here is EXECUTION and whether or not an investor has confidence in Steipps ability to reach that projected 1 to 2 year outlook of getting contracts. As well as, how much shareholders will be diluted during this period.

Having Apple and Swatch as licensees should be more than priced in at this point. I am sure when Steipp sees a potential client he conveys the crediblibility of having these large partnerships, but, at the end of the day, a potential client will choose which material is most efficient to use on many different levels to make its parts.

What happened to the Bentley Key Fob idea? I actually thought that LM would be a perfect material to use for the following reasons.

1. Pocket scuff age. LM scratch resistance is key.

2. Lightweight. No one wants to carry a brick in their pocket.

3. Corrosion resistant and appearance. LM is very attractive in pictures. The only actually piece I have ever seen is the SIM card ejector tool and it has some obvious scratches but, is shiny.

4. Because Bentley can afford to use whatever material they believe would impress and satisfy the customers. Sure they wouldn't sell a zillion of them, but, LQMT could charge premium margins and would further gain luxury credibility, like Swatch.

Gotta start somewhere. Just my opinion. Good luck guys.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent LQMT News