Replies to post #135272 on Sarissa Resources Inc (SRSR)

[jfburk]

Exactly and thank you

What we have in pink sheet stocks is a very short term mentality and a lot of day traders making "milk" money. Sometimes there are pink sheet companies that are investment companies and not trading stocks because of what they own and hold.

IMO SRSR is an investment company that shouldn't be traded but should be purchased and held. You obviously believe that as you have committed a lot of money to this company's private placement program. I, like you, read the historical data and unlike other companies no one is going to create a new product to replace what the company has in the ground.

There is a lot of value in the ground with this company, lot of longs, a CEO who is a large shareholder, and minimal dilution over the years.

[es1]

i have read the 60 year old report that they did before they abandond the property. Nothing in there stating value at all.
but you are very aware of that. Your post says the same thing the 43-101 says which does nothing but say read the 60 year old report..

Show me the value

Dont try to hide the fact that there has never been a value stated.

Admit that there is no value here except what people assume based on a 60 year report, rumors, and scotts lies.

The value here is no more than what Scott paid for the land plus a bit of property value increase.

That is why everyone is here and SOE is not. SOE actually did their own valuation. and they passed after they were done Just like the Gulf report. They came, they tested, they ran.


SHOW me and the world how wrong I am.

SHOW the value, Or admit you cant