InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
6,001.35
(
0.10%
)
US TECH 100
20,537.20
(
-0.08%
)
Dow Jones
44,293.13
(
0.69%
)
Brent Oil
72.16
(
0.46%
)
Bitcoin
87,169.69
(
-1.78%
)

Replies to post #135274 on Sarissa Resources Inc (SRSR)

Replies to #135274 on Sarissa Resources Inc (SRSR)
icon url

dmbao

10/13/13 11:55 AM

#135275 RE: es1 #135274

There is a significant amount of Niobium contained in the property that is extractable and can be processed.

That is value.

It didn't have the same value 60 years ago as it does today and that is the key. The rocks didn't change in 60 years except now the price on the market place for processed Niobium is 5x higher.
icon url

dmbao

10/13/13 11:57 AM

#135276 RE: es1 #135274

The SOE hasn't run at all they are still engaged in the metallurgy study.
icon url

jfburk

10/13/13 1:01 PM

#135277 RE: es1 #135274

So tell me, did the rocks disappear? Did the value of those rocks change? Is the extraction process different today vs. then? Did the demand for Niobium change since that original report?

What caused you to invest in the first place? The historical data caused me to invest and I remain an INVESTOR not a trader. I have seen nothing to change the potential value of the property except to revise it upwards.