InvestorsHub Logo
Replies to #7257 on Rambus (RMBS)
icon url

smd1234

01/17/06 8:05 PM

#7259 RE: nickel #7257

They gain the avoidance of many forms of hurt

wilful infringement "extra" damages
wilful infringement liability for Rambus's atty fees

AT treble damages

possible injunction/shut down of US sales

contending with irate OEMs asking for imdenification (and security backing up the indemnification) after receiving infringement letters from Rambus

What did I miss?

================
what would amigos gain by accepting? They could easily prolong things for 3 or 4 more years b
icon url

msaba

01/17/06 8:13 PM

#7261 RE: nickel #7257

If we win in JW's court, he will issue his final rulings after the post trial motions by late summer. The CAFC took a bit too long to review the VAI case, I would think they will take a lot less this time, let's say a year, and they WILL confirm JW's ruling by late summer 2007, SC will decide not to hear the case in the fall of 2007.

Hynix will have then to agree to any terms of Rambus. ANY.

And the rest will follow suit. (pun not intended)