InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Ajax133

10/01/13 2:02 PM

#15247 RE: KCSVEN #15244

KCSVEN" Great response. Meaningful and makes a lot of sense.
The only purpose of my recent postings is to encourage this
type of enlightening dialogue. It is extremely productive,
and cuts to the chase.
icon url

alternatepatel

10/01/13 2:51 PM

#15255 RE: KCSVEN #15244

why they need to prove they can sell >bn$ a year?
They have a ++superior product compared to a bn$ product (Lovaza). That's enough to make even a dumb believe Vascepa can sell bn$ a year.

Profitability....
Why PCYC has a MCap of >10bn$ ? They are at-least 6 months away from approval and probably 9 months away from launch of first product and probably few year(s) away from profitability. If one can answer that, AMRN doesn't need to show profitability to WS for a 5-6bn MCap valuation.

Bottomline
AMRN is drastically undervalued. Can't say it any better.
icon url

yellow_bluff

10/01/13 3:43 PM

#15264 RE: KCSVEN #15244

agreed. we are here clamoring that the stock should be higher, but science aside, if you look at the numbers, you have a small drug co w huge cash burn who already had a $1B mkt cap, doing a GIA and numbers have to keep coming down while cash raises and other financings continue at a steady pace.

while we all believe in anchor, etc, one could make a decent case that it is not wildly undervalued unless you think anchor sells itself in six months...