InvestorsHub Logo

Budax

09/26/13 4:30 PM

#18256 RE: junkHustler #18255

I believe they have to announce a material development such as this very quickly after it is signed. I would want him to make such a deal when he can and not try to time it with market activities. This is a long term investment, and for me, day to day price movements are not important.

trimmer30

09/26/13 4:31 PM

#18257 RE: junkHustler #18255

I totally agree with this statement. The R/S debaucle is a horrible miscalculation by management.

junkHustler

09/26/13 6:06 PM

#18261 RE: junkHustler #18255

I apologize for a typo. I wrote "pos" instead of "pps".

It was a mistake and I hope I didn't offend anyone.

GLTA

bpatient

09/26/13 10:12 PM

#18266 RE: junkHustler #18255

I do understand and appreciate your point, but the latest PR was not what the market was looking for. It was more of the same with no mention of actual revenue. The PR that is most anticipated is the announcement of financing for the cyclotron, and consequently Positron's business plan. This would confirm actual dollars invested in Positron's future.
I still maintain that a R/S at the current price, resulting in a 40 cent stock, will not accomplish Positron's objective (as indicated in the R/S news release). They, including Covington, recognize that the share price must be worth dollars and not pennies for Positron to be taken seriously and the stock to be accessible to large investors.
Again ... I appreciate your comments.