Let's reason this out. Is this "known contempt" truth? If so, what are Gary's reasons for such a position? If contempt is not true, what are both sides of this picture? If Gary is not working on our behalf, what reason would we want him to have his bonus and salary off our backs without representing us? Would not all the board and Lanza also suffer along with us if Gary has contempt for us? Can Gary just give himself more shares without the boards approval?, if so could there be known contempt from Lanza towards us and also known contempt from the board?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
