InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,344.16
(
0.47%
)
US TECH 100
18,024.00
(
0.56%
)
Dow Jones
39,497.54
(
0.13%
)
Brent Oil
79.49
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
61,051.88
(
0.28%
)
Post# of 92948
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

chuckanutman

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 43
Posts 5405
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/05/2010

chuckanutman

Re: elysse1kittycat post# 54784

Tuesday, 08/13/2013 10:00:03 AM

Tuesday, August 13, 2013 10:00:03 AM

Post# of 92948
Let's reason this out. Is this "known contempt" truth? If so, what are Gary's reasons for such a position? If contempt is not true, what are both sides of this picture? If Gary is not working on our behalf, what reason would we want him to have his bonus and salary off our backs without representing us? Would not all the board and Lanza also suffer along with us if Gary has contempt for us? Can Gary just give himself more shares without the boards approval?, if so could there be known contempt from Lanza towards us and also known contempt from the board?
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up