InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,344.16
(
0.47%
)
US TECH 100
18,024.00
(
0.56%
)
Dow Jones
39,497.54
(
0.13%
)
Brent Oil
79.49
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
60,877.52
(
0.00%
)

Replies to post #18024 on Intellicell Biosciences Inc (fka SVFC)

Replies to #18024 on Intellicell Biosciences Inc (fka SVFC)
icon url

Nadendla

08/08/13 10:03 PM

#18035 RE: BigBadWolf #18024

Why did both of them make legal invalid filings..I would agree with one ..but why both??..Who holds the Note..only the note holder should be able to do that..and that too after taking written consent from the company...Is it possible that they could have lost the note and everybody is scrambling to give notices to the company..

SVFC
icon url

cazual

08/08/13 10:13 PM

#18038 RE: BigBadWolf #18024

If that's the case then TCP has to show that efforts were made to negotiate and remedy the default.
icon url

Nadendla

08/08/13 10:26 PM

#18041 RE: BigBadWolf #18024

How can Ironridge be the owner when TCP holds the Note??..can you imagine guys dishing out SC 13D's without being the owner of the note..and then bidding for the companies..won't the court see that something is wrong..given that both TCP and Ironridge both gave notices to the company..and then they find Ironridge bidding at the auction..They will know something is not right..

SVFC