InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Cass

06/24/13 5:35 PM

#3908 RE: Zizek #3907

Great post Zizek. Perhaps re-post it regularly if required?
icon url

skibum2k

06/24/13 5:38 PM

#3909 RE: Zizek #3907

Zizek, just an outstanding post! Picasso quality!
icon url

MagicWhitePipe

06/25/13 7:24 PM

#3917 RE: Zizek #3907

1) Because Cecil can keep dumping year after year on multiple bogus products. 60 million blown and ZERO revenue.. well I can't lie.. $69,000 in revenue. And on each and every device, there is NEVER anything on why they were pulled after all the NR's about big distribution deals and contracts and licencing..etc..etc.. One after another they quietly drop them and move on. Either it means this group is completely incompetent and cannot put a deal together, or it means the products never worked, or it means the deals were bogus and just used to create volume to sell shares. RMOTC results have no baseline of the device without it installed. MULTIPLE scientists have stated over and over again Tao has a problem with his experimental method. It's like him claiming 20% better combustion with Elektra when internal engine combustion is already 98-99% efficient..

STWA paid $150,000 and 50,000 shares of stock to a penny email promoter recently as they have in the past on multiple occasions along with every 'device'. NO LEGIT COMPANY DOES THIS. THe only reason to be focused on PPS only is to sell shares and enrich, or to sell shares to raise money. Which is it?

2) There has been no field testing beyond 24 hour period 'testing' with a flawed method. For me, my doubt is well grounded in the fact I am in this industry. Every other doubt is just basic common sense. And once again, RMOTC did not fabricate the data.. they simply signed off on it. What is so hard about that to understand? They did not create the test, they did not create the procedure or anything of the sort. They provided a rented facility. AS I have said before, I could bring them a box, not plug it in.. but have them test power coming out one side of it. They sign off that is true. Does that mean I have created perpetual energy or some new energy source? So Cecil didn't "buy off the DOE". He rented their facility, and their people signed off on results. But the fact is,

icon url

mr_sano

06/28/13 3:45 PM

#3920 RE: Zizek #3907

The company absolutely should quell all question by running a well controlled third party test to verify the result. No smoke and mirrors just a scientific study run at industry rates under real world condition's for a period time perhaps a week or more. If AOT does what it says it should be very easy to document by a third party outfit and this would eclipse any road show or promo piece this company has engaged into date.


The longer they wait...the more sceptical the market will become. There is no way that prospective buyers will accept existing results as definitive proof...its just not logical to assume companies will believe what is presented given the sketchy basket of products that have preceded AOT.

It's also zero responsibility to proved without a shadow of a doubt that the device works and offers cost/benefit that can easily be calculate. Unfortunately you're logic suggests that the proof is already been established. I think this is what is generally dividing most views.