InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

mjkiii

05/31/13 6:43 AM

#20620 RE: carlosc #20619

My guesses would be,

1. Some legal requirement or protocol timeline mandated disclosure.

2. Too big a story to hold, it was leaking, so there could be liability created.

3. Wanted to get it into FY 2013.

4. Perhaps FQM wanted it announced.

5. Perhaps a political reason.

Any of those reasons, if true, would override the potential dilution of one million shares.
icon url

Implanting

05/31/13 9:54 AM

#20623 RE: carlosc #20619

Carlosc, I don't think we have to worry about those warrants. It would seem the market isn't very impressed with the JV news at least at the open. PTQMF hasn't had a single share traded this morning. LOL