InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,477.90
(
0.16%
)
US TECH 100
19,129.60
(
-0.24%
)
Dow Jones
39,127.80
(
0.04%
)
Brent Oil
84.17
(
-0.36%
)
Bitcoin
60,880.24
(
0.11%
)
Post# of 26631
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

mjkiii

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 7
Posts 4096
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/25/2006

mjkiii

Re: carlosc post# 20619

Friday, 05/31/2013 6:43:14 AM

Friday, May 31, 2013 6:43:14 AM

Post# of 26631
My guesses would be,

1. Some legal requirement or protocol timeline mandated disclosure.

2. Too big a story to hold, it was leaking, so there could be liability created.

3. Wanted to get it into FY 2013.

4. Perhaps FQM wanted it announced.

5. Perhaps a political reason.

Any of those reasons, if true, would override the potential dilution of one million shares.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up