InvestorsHub Logo

Tool_power

03/22/13 1:16 PM

#385317 RE: rainbow1111 #385316

Yup, nothing to see hear. This is a dead stock. These hedge funds are idiots.


lol...;-)

mgmuc

03/22/13 1:35 PM

#385318 RE: rainbow1111 #385316

So ... all this companies collected the shares in December 12 ! Again, now we know who all was on shopping-tour and why stock went up!

So they are buying worthless stock ? NOT ...

My guess is, they are buying for sure 3-6 months in advance, just to avoid ... insider trading ... etc. etc. ... especially A !

BigBang

03/22/13 1:36 PM

#385319 RE: rainbow1111 #385316

I don't think so. I believe this is a year end statement of ownership. These represent wmih shares received by the hedge fund upon our exit from bankruptcy in 2012 just like we all did.

REALtime64

03/22/13 4:56 PM

#385328 RE: rainbow1111 #385316

Yes correct Appaloosa Management LP 17,029,994 8.47 17,029,994 New 0 12/31/2012
Now you have to ask why and at the last day of the year right before tax time to make ya think something's up IMO

bkshadow

03/22/13 5:27 PM

#385336 RE: rainbow1111 #385316

2012 New Shareholders...

1. The notations of Appaloosa and Greywolf should give rise to consider that the Hartford funds might be the same, as is for all WMIHC holders. Positions @ 12/31/12 are New in 2012 for everyone. The Greywolf shares are exactly what they disclosed right after emergence (conversion shares), and Appaloosa disclosed at the post-year end due date (conversion shares, filed as a different 'non-group status than Greywolf).

So, since these two disclosed the same amounts at the time, and Morningstar reports them as New Shares/Buyer Shareholders IN 2012, they are simply reporting the conversion shares acquired.

2. Re: 5% discussions, it is actually 4.75% that is in the amended and restated Articles that are known as "Substantial Shareholders." Greywolf aggregated > % and filed as such. Appaloosa aggregated > % and filed under an exception.

3. There is ONE LIMIT on any buyer of WMIHC securities; in total, considering the additions by "substantial holders," the percentage increase cannot be 50% or greater. Existing "substantial holders" can, with the BOD approval under the 15-day rule in the Articles, buy 49% of the outstanding shares (staying under 50% in added percentage). So, in essence, with BOD approval, someone with 7 or 8% could be allowed to buy 49% more. With regard to someone with 0%, they too could buy 49% of the shares, but they must stop at 4.75% first, and get the BOD approval to add any more.

4. It gets a little messy with issuance of the commons and preferreds, but simply math.