InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 51
Posts 4234
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/22/2010

Re: rainbow1111 post# 385316

Friday, 03/22/2013 5:27:54 PM

Friday, March 22, 2013 5:27:54 PM

Post# of 730658
2012 New Shareholders...

1. The notations of Appaloosa and Greywolf should give rise to consider that the Hartford funds might be the same, as is for all WMIHC holders. Positions @ 12/31/12 are New in 2012 for everyone. The Greywolf shares are exactly what they disclosed right after emergence (conversion shares), and Appaloosa disclosed at the post-year end due date (conversion shares, filed as a different 'non-group status than Greywolf).

So, since these two disclosed the same amounts at the time, and Morningstar reports them as New Shares/Buyer Shareholders IN 2012, they are simply reporting the conversion shares acquired.

2. Re: 5% discussions, it is actually 4.75% that is in the amended and restated Articles that are known as "Substantial Shareholders." Greywolf aggregated > % and filed as such. Appaloosa aggregated > % and filed under an exception.

3. There is ONE LIMIT on any buyer of WMIHC securities; in total, considering the additions by "substantial holders," the percentage increase cannot be 50% or greater. Existing "substantial holders" can, with the BOD approval under the 15-day rule in the Articles, buy 49% of the outstanding shares (staying under 50% in added percentage). So, in essence, with BOD approval, someone with 7 or 8% could be allowed to buy 49% more. With regard to someone with 0%, they too could buy 49% of the shares, but they must stop at 4.75% first, and get the BOD approval to add any more.

4. It gets a little messy with issuance of the commons and preferreds, but simply math.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News