InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

imiloa

03/16/13 5:03 PM

#79646 RE: koonohiokala #79642

koono, seems prudent to look deeper into pink stocks/CEOs before gambling money on them, especially before accusing other people of lying.

5 years ago, Mark bought the PINR shell, rebranding it as MIKP.

Mark then diluted to 11b OS with gagged TA,
then did the 100:1 RS in early 2011, which you found online.
then diluted in less than a year to 2b.

iirc, PINR shell had about 2b OS as time of xfer.
so technically, Mark only diluted ~11b shares over the last 5 years.

but it's still a substantial number.
and even if all were dumped at 0001 (which they weren't), that would be $1.1m.

from watching nearly all the dumps since MIKP inception, i'd estimate Mark has reaped ~$5-10m from stock dumps over the past 5 years, roughly $1m-2m per year.

from that perspective, our thread was about how Mark has spent that money...
icon url

Just1MoreUpTick

03/17/13 8:55 AM

#79666 RE: koonohiokala #79642

You're disputing indisputable facts. Mark raised the OS/AS upwards of 11 billion shares, printing shares and paying promoters so he could dump those shares on unsuspecting investors using bogus PRs/NRs. Just because you're unaware doesn't change the facts.

I have yet to find information relating to your speculation about MIKP having issued/sold 11-13 billion shares (AS or OS). I researched as far back as 2009. I have only "inactive" reports to go on at this point.

Also, selling shares traded on the otc is difficult to say the least, (I'm sure you already know this).

So, I have to conclude as follows:
the speculation/theory/idea/scenario of MIKP having sold 11-13 billion shares (*since 2009) is severely unsubstantiated and therefor unlikely, (like my theory of Mark and the Finra guys' daughter). :)



Also, selling shares traded on the otc is difficult to say the least, (I'm sure you already know this).


This is why he had to pay promoters and issue skewed PRs & NRs to create liquidity.