InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,464.62
(
-0.16%
)
US TECH 100
19,220.00
(
-0.20%
)
Dow Jones
39,150.33
(
0.04%
)
Brent Oil
84.39
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
64,268.51
(
0.28%
)

Replies to post #82180 on Inca Designs, Inc. (fka IDGI)

Replies to #82180 on Inca Designs, Inc. (fka IDGI)

floridagal

02/12/13 4:49 PM

#82181 RE: oakhill3 #82180

I agree, no way the SEC didn't give written notice of intent, which I can only believe was deliberately ignored by S & E.
Todays slap in the face was an invite to their trunk show...

garyev

02/12/13 5:18 PM

#82182 RE: oakhill3 #82180

http://www2.miami-dadeclerk.com/civil/Search.aspx

ROSENBLATT, MICHAEL J
vs
INCA DESIGNS INC
Case Number: 2010-54174-CA-01

THIS guys sued them and won and he was investor.

LV RDPD

02/12/13 6:32 PM

#82186 RE: oakhill3 #82180

I think it's possible an attorney might look at this and agree the lack of action on the part of Stacy could have been deliberate.



And in defense with no disrespect it may be questioned on the lack of action by the investor of why one would stay invested in an otc that has not filed in over 2 years.

Has anyone been in touch with Stacy INCA Designs to see what their intentions are regarding the matter. If there are no actions on their part (Filings or PRs) then we can only assume the worse.