Really? LMFAO "And in defense with no disrespect it may be questioned on the lack of action by the investor" According to my last understanding, the Investor has no obligation to "ACT". I am hoping that Stacy and Evan get a new one reamed. They are nothing but scum bag crooks. (IMHO) Seriously? I don't believe that you think this is a valid defense (no matter how it is presented) in a court of law? As to why anybody would stay invested? That is simple. They preyed on the inexperienced "investor".
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
