InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Dr PeteRose MLB

01/26/13 5:49 PM

#23747 RE: rgshredder #23746

[Deep down I feel like they're blatantly making this merger agreement so flawed as to all but guarantee a vote of no by SH on all counts. To what end, I have no idea... /quote]

It would be a surprise to me, but the way this game is played they may be using the merger as a bluff to solicit a superior offer. I know I know wishful thinking.

icon url

Jeffqdh

01/26/13 6:52 PM

#23748 RE: rgshredder #23746

RS

How should the market have reacted ?

Has Mr Simes provided the path forward for new efficacy trials ? Did the request using P & G or 505a results to either waive new Efficscy trials or reduce the size required ?

Let's assume FDA would allow all or part and Bpax released news of same along with final 9 th review ??? He pps would have skyrocketed ,

Mr Simes said they would meet with FDA and explore all poss ave , that was several months ago,

Why did bpax decide not to meet with FDA ? Our they did what was the outcome of that meeting ?


Did the FDA reject using other data ? If so say it !!!

If not why did the not ask !

All valid questions that need answers, prior to voting

Ty Jmho