InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 280
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/12/2012

Re: Jeffqdh post# 23737

Saturday, 01/26/2013 5:15:21 PM

Saturday, January 26, 2013 5:15:21 PM

Post# of 26138
Let me start by saying I agree with everything you are saying. Is it possible that they are indirectly acknowledging the MM control over PPS by saying that despite the positive outcome of the study, they would expect little reaction on PPS (as a result of this control)...When they approved Bio-t gel, the pps shot up and down in a day and sporadically goes up and down on no news throughout the year. Wishful thinking would be they're going to release multiple positive PR in a short amount of time to suppress this control as JTFM eluded to.

I can't imagine the BOD actually believing we would be voting for their bonuses...worst fear would be they're using the CRV in exchange for this vote...no bonus, no CRV which would clearly demonstrate their loyalty to their SH.

Deep down I feel like they're blatantly making this merger agreement so flawed as to all but guarantee a vote of no by SH on all counts. To what end, I have no idea...
-RG

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.