InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

island_looker

01/24/13 5:40 PM

#13502 RE: newadventure #13499

Perhaps if MSX gets nowhere with the BCSC and OSC, I would think a trip to NEW York would be the next step but only with OVERSHELMING evidence that barrick has been commiting FRAUD on MSX/JL titles of ownership at pascua

barrick trades on the american exchanges and if their canadian friends at bcsc and osc will not do anything due to lack of evidence...etc...

I would drag every one of them into Canadian Court and SUE all of them but only if JL is successful at law in Chile as in my opinion whatever is dealt out by the chilean courts v. barrick in chile will have to be upheld in canada, perhaps I am wrong here but only makes sense, Chile is not considered a Somalia like country and canada should not twist everything around for barricks advantage at law in this country but I guess anything is possible when you have alot of money, perhaps that money or some of it will come to MSX shareholders through a TOP SECRET DEAL with MSX
icon url

JRLopehandia

01/24/13 11:57 PM

#13512 RE: newadventure #13499

To find out what regulators did or did not

you must look under the carpet

it is all there shoveled

In fact at TSX they protected ABX and chased MWR away.

Just like HSBC did ambushing MSX while Maria Phyllis Emery created BARRICK 2 to peddle bogus Roayalties to the markets on BOGUS PASCUA PONZI + LAMA an Argentine asset, unable to legally tie it from Chile or with Chile deeds. As done in crime, in Chile and abroad.

Pascua Royalties anyone? what denomination my hearties? = ABX

You are bang on in your assessment NO NEW EVIDENCE THEY SAY?

I say no guts to face their errors v. MSX while protecting ABX

simply disgraceful