You must not be in a business where these documents exist. Generally, CA's are signed before a meeting takes place to protect any proprietary data that could be discussed in the meeting. Without a CA ahead of the meeting none of the data that was discussed would be protected. Look to the case of insider trading between Mark Cuban and the SEC. it all came down to whether there was an expectation of confidentiality.
For example, if after the meeting Kinross realizes that SRGE is a pump and dump and owns nothing. Kinross would be bound by an agreement that prohibits them from disclosing it.
Kinross also signed another CA with ALTO - another scammy mining company and no deal was ever completed. As already mentioned - that is why one would sign a C/A - so scammy companies don't start tossing their names around as an interested party or having a deal with them - when all they did was TALK and look at what they had.
Read the Kinross emails being passed around MOMO - there is nothing in that that suggests any sort of a deal other than a meeting to discuss what they might have.
And believe me if MOMO had a copy of J/V signed by Kinross it would have been posted here in a heartbeat.
Not the first time stock touts have made claims of buyouts by major Gold companies either:
If you remember back - about September 24th a FAKE Awesomepennystock newsletter appeared claiming that Goldcorp was interested in a buyout of SRGE - which the Fake newsletter appearing to be the work of the WSIN promo group. Just like the Mathers Research report and the Awesome-stocks.net fake alerts.