Replies to post #12349 on Mountainstar Gold Inc (fka MSX)

[yourkidinright]

goldpanner:

Maybe only because the commission was never notified/unaware....until now. I will make a point of pointing out this discrepancy of what this press release says and MSXs latest legal filing to the BCSC in a phone call and email sometime this week. Thanks.

[Grand Poobah]

Exactly GP. MSX has stated clearly JL has unencumbered titles to Mina Pascua. The events in Chile are to strike Amarillo 1-3000 and Tesoro 1 1/30 to Tesoro 12 1/5 from the Chile registry, sue Barrick for damages and extinguish Barricks Pascua Lama Protocol on the grounds of entering titles Barrick misrepresented.

We all know some PR's were retracted because MSX was boldly expressing Barrick's filings were fraudulent. The PR's were very aggressive against ABX in order to get them to reply publicly. Barrick was forced to reply and provided a PR of their own which shows inaccurate information and misrepresentation of Jorge Lopehandia's interest to the Tesoro titles and his rights to Mina Pascua. The BCSC ask MSX to retract those PR's with a lighter tone, which MSX has done, however MSX was right saying Barricks filing were fraudulent and continues to assert Jorge's ownership rights without a single lawsuit out of Barrick or additional involvement from the BCSC. Yourkidinright has also expressed that Barricks filings are a fraud in a post here, so makes one wonder who the BCSC is trying hard protect, investors or Barrick? I don't think the BCSC or OSC will have a choice with investigating Barrick more critically soon.