InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 2409
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/29/2012

Re: A deleted message

Sunday, 09/02/2012 1:31:18 AM

Sunday, September 02, 2012 1:31:18 AM

Post# of 30013
rover:

If you read my previous posts here you will see that I agree that Barrick is not the title holder....but neither is JL. You need to look no further than SEDAR to see that.

I also have covered in a previous post why BARRICK has not attacked MSX....because they (BARRICK) DON'T own it!! But don't make the mistake of thinking JL DOES. You yourself just said that MSX is now putting out more accurate info, right? So how do you explain SEDAR? Please, I want to hear your opinion because either MSX or JL is lying (or breaking security law in MSX's case).

As far as being a paid basher they would have to pay me only about 50 cents a day to bash this stock because it does it's own bashing by the amount of red flags and incompetence by management I see here almost every day. (they should have all been canned just for letting out press releases that looked like they were written by a challenged 3rd grader) Also, bashers talk usually in general terms and half truths....care to point me to a post that I have written that is not based on facts?

By the way you said "The noose is tightening around Barrick's neck so out come the paid posters to attempt to rewrite reality".... care to tell me what "reality" is? I'd love to hear it.

So again....just because Barrick does not own it does not mean JL owns it.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.