Thanks for reiterating these factors
I have read the differing reports, the multiple aquifers, the history, etc.
I guess my point was the company is not helping itself at all by letting such wordings get past the final company edit review in the reports
Aurcana sounds like it has all proper plans in place to deal responsibly with the use of water and the dewatering of the deeper levels of the workings . . . but they do really need to step up the effort to get this publicity issue behind them