InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,983.99
(
-0.29%
)
US TECH 100
20,507.20
(
-0.04%
)
Dow Jones
43,910.98
(
-0.86%
)
Brent Oil
72.36
(
1.03%
)
Bitcoin
87,512.24
(
-0.47%
)

Replies to post #81488 on Green Leaf Innovations Inc (GRLF)

Replies to #81488 on Green Leaf Innovations Inc (GRLF)
icon url

iwant2barafter

08/30/12 1:11 PM

#81490 RE: gitreal #81488

Totally disagree.
icon url

$b_rich$

08/30/12 1:15 PM

#81491 RE: gitreal #81488

I doubt it would matter what mine they got involved with as far as you're concerned. You've made your opinion clear. It's cool though....I'm waiting it out for new announcements:) Go GDSM!
icon url

Shawn Carter

08/30/12 1:30 PM

#81495 RE: gitreal #81488

Could it be the Azurite mine will take less money to start producing and therefore is a better option wouldn't ya think!!!!
icon url

Actuate

08/30/12 2:35 PM

#81510 RE: gitreal #81488

GDSM obviously feels that their money and efforts will be able to bring the Azurite into production more quickly than the Gold Star.
I think it would be beneficial for them to focus their efforts on the mine that they think can be placed into production more quickly; thus, I believe they are going about this the correct way.

I disagree with you on your thought that this is currently a pump and dump. With the sparse PRs, there is no pump involved. A true pump and dump company will release PRs at least 1-2 times a week. That isn't the case with GDSM.