InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 183
Posts 41402
Boards Moderated 5
Alias Born 03/21/2012

Re: $b_rich$ post# 81487

Thursday, 08/30/2012 1:07:12 PM

Thursday, August 30, 2012 1:07:12 PM

Post# of 162649
Absolutely. If they cannot show progress on the first project they were so heavily promoting since earlier this year, why would anyone believe that taking on a second project is a good idea? The schedule in the GDSM Marketing Presentation is completely shot, with no real explanation of why. How hard is it to take 25 surface samples - 2-3 days of effort ought to do it. That's only 8 samples a day.

If real progress was being accomplished at the Gold Star/Gold Crown project, sure, go ahead and get another project in the pipeline. But, the impression I get is that they cannot get the simplest of tasks done on the Gold Star, and are trying to divert attention to this beat-up, mined-out, hardrock mine. With the added bonus of a big pile of tailings that are nothing but an environmental liability.

As for being a P&D, of course it is. Let's not beat around the bush. Look what happened back in February/March.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent GRLF News