Replies to post #5227 on NanoTech Gaming Inc (NTGL)

[abcsofhealth]

At this point this company is worth approx. 7.5 million dollars US. 5.3BIL STOCKS X .0014; That would translate to a RS of approx 704 TO 1. This would bring it to a $1.00 stock price. Ain't gonna happen. There is no way this stock is viable with its present production facitities at its present dillution. Disclosure of its actual financial numbers would KILL this stock. If all its ovens were running 24/7 and its product base was selling at a huge premium; there still isn't enough capacity to justify a EPS improvement at this dilution level. The relative pricing of this stock is best served by NO disclosure of the actuals. What we need is a LOT of hype and a big PR of how much this company plans to grow with its super future products. I will write it for them: CTKH makes contact with a China based large production company that specializes in flat screen technology for an exclusive. The NY based Cetek (CTKH.PK) company disclosed that talks are under way and exclusive use is pending. The NY based company specializes in ceramic base screen technology that has the rest of the tech world scrambling to compete with. "As far as the rest of the competition; CTKH technology is 3 to 5 years ahead of its nearest competitor base" stated a high level undisclosed source.
Hows that for PR; state nothing but appear to have a market break through.
Just my opinion.
The BET is still on.
Have a nice day!
abcs

[estaban]

Penny

I am not planning on flushing out FH.

I am very comfortable with my ctkh shares.

Quit crying and sell your shares. Ctkh is only going up over the next 2 years. I do not see the cash flow problem but you better sell for the 1000 time the R/s is coming from your mouth.

You and orange need to disclose not FH. The rabbit is loose as a goose.

[leotxtx]

penny: the little i've read in the sec regs seems to indicate lots of loop holes re the requirements for forcing reporting

i'm not an attorney, but it seems there's all kinds of clauses saying the sec has the final word re "shareholders" value, etc

i can tell you though if there's a loophole where, regardless of the # of shareholders, if there's some clause saying if there's not x amt of profit, or revenue, it wouldn't be hard to keep buying things, paying out $ to preferred shareholders, etc to accomplish that

and a reverse split could be done anytime, forcing a huge sell off ('cause of huge loss in share value) dropping the shareholders back below 300 (if that was the only criteria, which i don't think it is, but again, i am not an attorney)

my best benefit of the doubt guess re fayiz is he's struggling to survive not only now, but in what looks to be a big storm slow down in the market and world economy (even if only short timed and temporary, ie, a few quarters or so)

is this regard, he's gotta do what we dotta do individually, survive financially the best we can

good luck penny, keep putting out your thoughts, they carry a lot of weight