InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

jpaige17

08/05/12 2:05 PM

#15053 RE: Watts Watt #15052

I was wondering if anybody would bring that up. Thanks for posting it. I guess the good side to that is that he doesn't want to part with his stock.
icon url

Watts Watt

08/05/12 2:13 PM

#15056 RE: Watts Watt #15052

Latest Insider Trades
10/31/2011
STEIPP THOMAS W
Open market or private sale of non-derivative or derivative security
Shares sold: 15,000
Share price: $0.20
Trans. value: $3,000.00
10/26/2011
STEIPP THOMAS W
Open market or private sale of non-derivative or derivative security
Shares sold: 15,000
Share price: $0.20
Trans. value: $3,000.00
08/26/2011
SALAS RICARDO A
Open market or private sale of non-derivative or derivative security
Shares sold: 30,000
Share price: $0.32
Trans. value: $9,600.00
icon url

golong22

08/05/12 2:14 PM

#15057 RE: Watts Watt #15052

Watts, the fact that Steipp did NOT sell is highly positive. Why sell when you know good things are coming and you can get higher prices? As far as "in the midst" and Kang Gang...sadly, I must agree. The fact that he stated he was going to sell dragged the pps down to lower levels where others could get in cheap...a cheap ploy to shake out shares, but it works everytime.

"Anybody remember when Steipp announced he was going to sell 450,000 shares for tax purposes.."

Announcements upon announcements that never come true? In the midst...I'm selling! (ha ha! Not!) We're shipping! (Whoopsies! Protypes!) Con artists? Part of the Kang Gang? What does the evidence tell you? ( If you (or anyone here) really believed con-artists still run the show, you wouldn't keep buying in, would you?) So what's really going on? Oh yea! NDA!
icon url

Infohunter

08/05/12 2:39 PM

#15060 RE: Watts Watt #15052

Refer to post 12768

I haven't ruled out #1.