InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 113
Posts 16414
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/22/2011

Re: None

Sunday, 08/05/2012 1:53:09 PM

Sunday, August 05, 2012 1:53:09 PM

Post# of 233113
Anybody remember when Steipp announced he was going to sell 450,000 shares for tax purposes? This dragged the PPS of the stock WAY down, along with Salas's sales as well.

Well, guess how many he actually sold:

ONLY: Shares sold: 15,000
Share price: $0.20
Trans. value: $3,000.00

He took out a loan instead of actually selling what he was going to sell.

A BIT DISINGENUOUS, NO?

He suffered a wee bit loss of 15,000 shares.

HOW MUCH DID THE SHAREHOLDERS SUFFER?

BIG EFFIN DIFFERENCE.

This is very, very DISHONEST.

This is why I do not feel we got an upgrade in management from Kang to Steipp, ethics-wise. This along with the "in the midst" comments of March 6, 2012, makes me think that the Kangs are still, very, very much in charge. Con-artists attract con-artists. This also explaings why the cronies and nepots of Kang are still working in the company. Steipp has not fired even ONE of Kangs cronies or nepots after TWO YEARS.

This is BULL SHEET.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent LQMT News