InvestorsHub Logo

Silvergoldenapple

06/11/12 12:24 AM

#13735 RE: DeeDog #13734

Yes DeeDog, no vote turns into a yes vote by proxy. A protest vote no would be purely symbolic. The company more than likely has enough votes already to keep things status quo.

They are doing an excellent job in building us a great company that has enough cash to survive the future for us investors. I think they deserve a "yes" vote!

SOUTHPEN

06/11/12 10:49 AM

#13737 RE: DeeDog #13734

My question about voting concerning the BOD is ,If you vote NO ,What happens to the merger or formation of the new company ?,if in fact, the BOD was removed.
Most say that's unlikely and that very well could be ,but I am sure that these Directors and management do noy have large percentages of shares ,dating way back.Not rich guys. Sprott owns 14% and theres a couple more institutions that own UK amount of shares but considering that 2/3 of the votes (if that's correct )must be YES votes ,I think the count could be closer than many believe. All speculation.I really have no idea how much of the company ,insiders own and also don't know any good numbers on how many longs here would vote no ,so I'm really looking for answers ,not trying to sway opinions concerning votes.