InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

golferwalt

09/02/05 1:26 AM

#124894 RE: Ghors #124893

Ghors-Great post-much clearer now-THANKS. Walt
icon url

laranger

09/02/05 8:27 AM

#124900 RE: Ghors #124893

Ghors/O'Dog.

Thanks so much for the clarification.

Many of us have silently been wondering how the arbitration panel, the 7-member ICC legal team, and ICC Court can arrive at a bullet-proof decision, if they must silmultaneously apply contract language, NY state law, and ICC rules.

As usual, Nokia wants to cherry-pick all three, as long as it works to its advantage.

Let's hope the Supreme Court has cleared the air.
icon url

captainslog

09/02/05 10:15 AM

#124907 RE: Ghors #124893

Invaluable! Thanks.
icon url

paheka

09/02/05 11:09 AM

#124911 RE: Ghors #124893

Thanks Ghors.actually its just "logical reasoning" that the ICC arbitration rules would apply because both parties signed the contract to abide by "binding arbitration".Indeed NY Law is also cited BUT the ICC agreement would trump that.Also with IDC citing the Supreme Ct case concerning this specific question as to application of what law's apply..you clarified it..Patience
icon url

Dave Davis

09/02/05 1:45 PM

#124928 RE: Ghors #124893

Ghors, Thanks. Very helpful.