Replies to post #124260 on InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[mschere]

IMO:Nokia's strategy is delay, obfuscate, scorch the earth,walk a legal tightrope, but DO NOT BREACH THEIR CURRENT PLA LICENSE for 2G/3G...which does not preclude a 2G/3G settlement..If and when IDCC files for Breach of Contract..while still attempting to collect on a monetary Judgement for 80% of the 2002-2006 Contract period.Remember, IDCC does not have to sit and wait to collect their 2G monies due from 2002 through June 2005..and allow Nokia to continue to enjoy the benefits of their Patent License, free of charge through the expiration date.


Good question: What is Nokia's strategy?

[loophole73]

Ranger

As I have said before, Nok sued in hopes of causing the named OEM's in their PLA with IDCC not to license 3g before the end of 2006. The question is why the Delaware judge is having trouble throwing Nok out of court. Nok is obviously expecting the boot by its filing on July 29, 2005 in the UK. Is this judge contemplating a Lynn type end run to keep Nok alive in his court? If he does, does IDCC cross-act with intentional interference with its ability to contract with others and bad faith dealings along with an infringement action? Nok will play its games so long as the judges alow it to do so. Lynn started a brown snow ball rolling down hill that stunk up the evidentiary hearing in the Nok arbitration and the Delaware judge needs to stop this big brown sphere before it stinks up our entire judicial system. The Circuit Court judges had to throw their shoes away after stepping on the Lynn decision because they could not get the smell off of them.

MO
loop