InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 164
Posts 6362
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/02/2003

Re: laranger post# 124260

Thursday, 08/25/2005 2:16:34 PM

Thursday, August 25, 2005 2:16:34 PM

Post# of 432775
Ranger

As I have said before, Nok sued in hopes of causing the named OEM's in their PLA with IDCC not to license 3g before the end of 2006. The question is why the Delaware judge is having trouble throwing Nok out of court. Nok is obviously expecting the boot by its filing on July 29, 2005 in the UK. Is this judge contemplating a Lynn type end run to keep Nok alive in his court? If he does, does IDCC cross-act with intentional interference with its ability to contract with others and bad faith dealings along with an infringement action? Nok will play its games so long as the judges alow it to do so. Lynn started a brown snow ball rolling down hill that stunk up the evidentiary hearing in the Nok arbitration and the Delaware judge needs to stop this big brown sphere before it stinks up our entire judicial system. The Circuit Court judges had to throw their shoes away after stepping on the Lynn decision because they could not get the smell off of them.

MO
loop
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News