Loophole73 I have been a stock holder since 1992. I bought my first at $3.5, I've been through the settlement between idcc and qcom, Mot at Delaware, the org siemens deal etc etc. I 'm simply stating a fact institutional investors think QCOM is the only cdma play. Obviously if I have held on all these years, I personally believe idcc has some valuable patents in wcdma. Otherwise, why would Nokia be fighting so hard. Rather than casting aspersions, it be more helpful to answer the simple question I posed. What does idcc have that qcom does not?