fsshon, your perspective sounds like the glass is half full.
I could easily take the opposite opinion and say the glass is half empty..
Some key points:
1.) Should have asked for an assets list which after 3 years, she still has not done.
2.) Should have realized Rosen turned against us when he said, "shareholders are trying to milk JPM." Yet she did nothing.
3.) Months later, in court, she had to again remind Rosen that he represents shareholders.. "your clients" is what I think she said..
4.) Why not put all the claims on the table... FDIC, JPM, WMI, Inc and let's see, who really has the most claims. This crap about the estate not being able to recover enough money against the claims of JPM/FDIC is crap and she knows it...
5.) Should have asked JPM to explain in detail their $54B in claims... She just assumed they are good and is using that against us, in both of her opinions.
6.) She also inserted herself as litigator in her opinions. That's not her job...
7.) Oh, and if this Judge is so great, then why is the EC appealing her rulings????
8.) etc, etc, I could go on and on...
Also, I keep hearing everybody say, "she could have easily wiped us out"... Really? I thought this Judge was your hero? How could she have easily wiped us out when there is money and claims for equity?
I could go on and on but why protect this Judge from citicism? Remember, the Government Civil Servants, like this Judge, work for us, the citizens. We don't work for her.
ND9