Replies to post #55279 on Tytan Holdings Inc (TYTN)

[justamechanic]

other than selling shares for helping TYTN grow (which is aceptable in my book) Mark is not selling shares to line his pockets.I would love to see your proof that Mark is selling shares for his personal gain.all I see is someone trying to grasp for a.straw.

[tushiecomplete]

The pr about the A/S increase on June 17th was followed by

1.) News of the port close to Tytan facility

2.) OTCSHUB.com mention of TYTN

3.) Announcement of new website

4.) Arrival of 304 Mini tractor

5.) Commercial chipper news

6.) Chinese tractor factory wants to visits

For some reason, the 2Q report isn't even pr'ed on this website, but info on where to go to see it can be found within one of the six you speak of.

Out of those six earth shattering pr's, which ones even created a pop in the first place so have "all lost their gains?" Also, anything been going on at all in the overall market that may have had just a little bit to do investors more than willing to jump up and down for joy over a .0002 pps profit?

bottom line, besides the news of a major Chinese tractor company wanting to come visit, and the possibilities surrounding the possible outcomes of their little get together, I don't see anything over the last two months that would, or should, warrant a move up of the pps, followed by a higher base forming.

Please give me a list, or one, of any stocks that you actually own shares in that are higher now than where the pps was in the middle of June. You seem to want to make TYTN's pps movement company specific because of specific actions taken here by the CEO. Give me the name of a specific pink stock company that I could research where the pps has gone up since the middle of June and held on to most of its gain, all without any major breaking news.

Would a truer statement be that stocks of all colors have tended down over the last two months, with any pops, especially in pink stock land, finding themselves back, or below, the pps where the pop began? An addendum to that statement would be, also especially when there really hasn't been any major earth shattering news associated with a specific stock to permanently alter its pps upward.

[dmlabuda]

Maybe I'm just a little dense but, I'm confused. Would you be kind enough to explain to me exactly how the O/S (i.e. outstanding shares) were "getting near the max". You see, I was under that assumption that the MAX for outstanding shares, that is the largest amount of outstanding shares was limited (or maxed out) by the total number of Authorized Shares (the A/S). I believe you said that "Mark Leonard was probably unable to dilute due to the O/S getting near the max." Dilute meaning increase the number of O/S??? So, my problem is that I do not understand what you mean by "max" and why would a company be unable to increase the Authorized Share amount because of the size of the outstanding shares? Please explain. OR, was that perhaps a slip of the wrist while you were typing that post?